Literature DB >> 7614284

Pediatric pain control and conscious sedation: a survey of emergency medicine residencies.

K Ilkhanipour1, C R Juels, M I Langdorf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the availability and relative use of pediatric analgesia and sedation at sites of U.S. emergency medicine residency training programs.
METHODS: A mail/telephone survey of residency directors at 80 U.S. emergency medicine residencies regarding resident experience with pediatric analgesia and sedation for painful procedures conducted during November 1991.
RESULTS: Sixty of 80 surveys (75%) were completed and available for analysis. Emergency medicine faculty supervised conscious sedation and analgesia in 87% of responding programs, while pediatrics faculty and pediatrics-emergency medicine fellows supervised in the remainder. Ninety-three percent of the programs had sedating agents available in the emergency department; only four programs needed to have drugs brought from the pharmacy. Thirty-four programs (57%) had formal protocols for the administration of these drugs. Seventy-seven percent of the programs had airway resuscitation equipment at the bedside, while only 63% brought resuscitation drugs. However, 60% of the programs reported complications of sedation, including respiratory depression, prolonged sedation, agitation, and vomiting. The most commonly used agents were midazolam (82%), meperidine alone (68%) and with promethazine and chlorpromazine (67%), and chloral hydrate (67%). Only 25% of the programs used nitrous oxide, and 30% used ketamine.
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine residencies generally have available agents for pain control and conscious sedation in children, although the agents used vary widely. Appropriate instruction by trained faculty should enhance resident experience with pediatric pain control and sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7614284     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02647.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

1.  A risk management audit: are we complying with the national guidelines for sedation by non-anaesthetists?

Authors:  M F Nicol
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-03

2.  Consigning "brutacaine" to history: a survey of pharmacological techniques to facilitate painful procedures in children in emergency departments in the UK.

Authors:  B Loryman; F Davies; G Chavada; T Coats
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Pediatric sedation: a global challenge.

Authors:  David Gozal; Keira P Mason
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2010-10-19

Review 4.  Ketamine for paediatric sedation/analgesia in the emergency department.

Authors:  M C Howes
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Knowledge, attitude and practices among health care professionals regarding pain.

Authors:  Lavanya Subhashini; Manju Vatsa; Rakesh Lodha
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacology of midazolam in infants and children.

Authors:  J L Blumer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.