Literature DB >> 7613619

Comparing localization of conventional functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography.

R Beisteiner1, G Gomiscek, M Erdler, C Teichtmeister, E Moser, L Deecke.   

Abstract

The technique of functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) allows the measurement of functional cerebral blood flow changes occurring with specific tasks. However, the spatial relationship between neuronal activity and functional cerebral blood flow changes is not known yet. This study compares the centre of neuronal activation (measured by magnetoencephalography) with that of the blood flow response (measured by FMRI) to unilateral motor stimulation in eight subjects. The results show a mean localization difference of 1.6 cm and demand application of methodological improvements as recently suggested.

Mesh：

Year:  1995        PMID： 7613619     DOI： 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb01101.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN： 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  9 in total

1.  MR blood oxygenation level-dependent signal differences in parenchymal and large draining vessels: implications for functional MR imaging.

Authors:  T Krings; S G Erberich; F Roessler; J Reul; A Thron
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Activation of multiple cortical areas in response to somatosensory stimulation: combined magnetoencephalographic and functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Korvenoja; J Huttunen; E Salli; H Pohjonen; S Martinkauppi; J M Palva; L Lauronen; J Virtanen; R J Ilmoniemi; H J Aronen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Quantification of fMRI artifact reduction by a novel plaster cast head holder.

Authors:  V Edward; C Windischberger; R Cunnington; M Erdler; R Lanzenberger; D Mayer; W Endl; R Beisteiner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Quantification and reproducibility of tracking cortical extent of activation by use of functional MR imaging and magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  T P Roberts; E A Disbrow; H C Roberts; H A Rowley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Clinical magnetoencephalography for neurosurgery.

Authors:  Steven M Stufflebeam
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Enhanced magnetic transduction of neuronal activity by nanofabricated inductors quantified via finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jack Phillips; Mitchell Glodowski; Yash Gokhale; Matthew Dwyer; Alireza Ashtiani; Aviad Hai
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Comparison of memory fMRI response among normal, MCI, and Alzheimer's patients.

Authors:  M M Machulda; H A Ward; B Borowski; J L Gunter; R H Cha; P C O'Brien; R C Petersen; B F Boeve; D Knopman; D F Tang-Wai; R J Ivnik; G E Smith; E G Tangalos; C R Jack
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Comparing the Microvascular Specificity of the 3- and 7-T BOLD Response Using ICA and Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging.

Authors:  Alexander Geißler; Florian Ph S Fischmeister; Günther Grabner; Moritz Wurnig; Jakob Rath; Thomas Foki; Eva Matt; Siegfried Trattnig; Roland Beisteiner; Simon Daniel Robinson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Can Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Generate Valid Clinical Neuroimaging Reports?

Authors:  Roland Beisteiner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.003
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.