Literature DB >> 761323

Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations.

K E Hammermeister, T A DeRouen, H T Dodge.   

Abstract

A progression of univariate followed by multivariate analyses was applied to 46 variables selected from the clinical examination, exercise test, coronary arteriography, and quantitative angiographic assessment of left ventricular function in patients with coronary disease to determine those variables most predictive of survival. For the 733 medically treated patients, the final Cox's regression analysis showed that the left ventricular ejection fraction was most predictive of survival, followed by age, number of vessels with stenosis(es) greater than or equal to 70%, and ventricular arrhythmia on the resting electrocardiogram. For the 1870 surgically treated patients, ventricular arrhythmia on the resting electrocardiogram was most predictive of survival followed by ejection fraction, heart murmur, left main coronary artery stenosis greater than or equal to 50%, and use of diuretic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 761323     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.59.3.421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  83 in total

1.  Left ventricular dysfunction: causes, natural history, and hopes for reversal.

Authors:  P W Armstrong
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Ventricular dilatation in the absence of ACE inhibitors: influence of haemodynamic and neurohormonal variables following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J T Walsh; P D Batin; M Hawkins; D McEntegart; A J Cowley
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Validation of 4D-MSPECT and QGS for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPET: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Claudia S A Lipke; Harald P Kühl; Bernd Nowak; Hans-Juergen Kaiser; Patrick Reinartz; Karl-Christian Koch; Udalrich Buell; Wolfgang M Schaefer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Automatic vs semi-automatic global cardiac function assessment using 64-row CT.

Authors:  J Greupner; E Zimmermann; B Hamm; M Dewey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Oxygen free radicals and congestive heart failure.

Authors:  J J Belch; A B Bridges; N Scott; M Chopra
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-05

Review 6.  Use of cardiac magnetic resonance to assess viability.

Authors:  Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Cardiac imaging with radionuclides.

Authors:  A Hargreaves; A L Muir
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-06-13

8.  Left ventricular function studied with MDCT.

Authors:  Kai Uwe Juergens; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Do coronary artery bypass operations prolong life?

Authors:  K W Carr; R L Engler; J Ross
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1982-04

Review 10.  A new look at coronary angiograms: plaque morphology as a help to diagnosis and to evaluate outcome.

Authors:  J Lespérance; P Théroux; G Hudon; D Waters
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1994-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.