Literature DB >> 7046257

Do coronary artery bypass operations prolong life?

K W Carr, R L Engler, J Ross.   

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass operations improve survival in patients with symptomatic left main coronary artery stenosis, but whether or not longevity is improved in other patients has been controversial. Small clinical studies, even when randomized, have not sufficiently controlled for the heterogeneous distribution of risk factors in patient cohorts treated medically and surgically. The first randomized study large enough to overcome such problems, the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study, showed that coronary artery bypass procedures prolonged survival only in the high-risk subgroup. The surgically treated patients suffered more perioperative morbidity and mortality and had worse long-term survival than similar patients operated on in more recent years. The European Coronary Surgery Study Group recently reported that the three-year to five-year survival of symptomatic patients with triple-vessel disease and normal left ventricular function was better if patients were randomly assigned to surgical therapy. The third and by far the largest randomized study, the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS), has not yet reported long-term follow-up results. Large clinical studies, both randomized and nonrandomized, that have subgrouped patients by the number of diseased coronary arteries and by the degree of left ventricular dysfunction all show that survival with single-vessel disease is excellent and not improved by operation. Medically treated patients with double- and triple-vessel disease who have good left ventricular function generally now have a five-year survival greater than 85 percent and only two of the major studies suggest that it is improved by operation. The results of most studies, however, suggest that bypass operation prolongs survival in symptomatic patients when left ventricular dysfunction coexists with double- and triple-vessel disease. Continually improving surgical techniques may potentiate the small survival differences that are now apparent, but until then, because the survival differences are so small, it is recommended that limiting anginal symptoms remain the primary indication for a coronary bypass procedure for an individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7046257      PMCID: PMC1273712     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  49 in total

Review 1.  The William F. Rienhoff, Jr. lecture. The coronary circulation.

Authors:  D C Sabiston
Journal:  Johns Hopkins Med J       Date:  1974-06

2.  Preinfarctional (unstable) angina--a prospective study--ten year follow-up. Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic changes.

Authors:  P C Gazes; E M Mobley; H M Faris; R C Duncan; G B Humphries
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A critique of methodology in studies of anticoagulant therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R H Gifford; A R Feinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Progress study of 590 consecutive nonsurgical cases of coronary disease followed 5-9 years. II. Ventriculographic and other correlations.

Authors:  A V Bruschke; W L Proudfit; F M Sones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Progress study of 590 consecutive nonsurgical cases of coronary disease followed 5-9 years. I. Arterographic correlations.

Authors:  A V Bruschke; W L Proudfit; F M Sones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Coronary bypass grafting in 476 patients consecutively operated on.

Authors:  J E Hutchinson; G E Green; H A Mekhjian; E Gallozzi; A Cameron; H G Kemp
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  The nature of treatment selection in coronary artery disease. Experience with medical and surgical treatment of a chronic disease.

Authors:  J F McNeer; C F Starmer; A G Bartel; V S Behar; Y Kong; R H Peter; R A Rosati
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Main left coronary artery disease. Clinical experience from 1964-1974.

Authors:  M V Cohen; R Gorlin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Surgical treatment for stable angina pectoris. Prospective randomized study.

Authors:  V S Mathur; G A Guinn; L C Anastassiades; R A Chahine; F L Korompai; A C Montero; R J Luchi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Improved long-term survival after aortocoronary bypass for advanced coronary artery disease.

Authors:  L H Cohn; C M Boyden; J J Collins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  1 in total

1.  Another indication for coronary bypass.

Authors:  R A Bruce; K F Hossack
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1982-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.