Literature DB >> 7612076

Test time and efficiency of the dynamic strategy in glaucoma perimetry.

J Weber1, T Klimaschka.   

Abstract

The dynamic strategy is a perimetric measurement procedure where by the luminance-step sizes are optimized according to physiological data. In contrast to the traditional 4- to 2-dB strategy, the step sizes are not constant but vary between 2 and 10 dB depending on the sensitivity. We examined 40 eyes of 40 glaucoma patients with both the traditional and the dynamic strategy using a modified Octopus 1-2-3 perimeter. A total of 16 visual field locations were examined using both strategies 3 times each in alternation. The order of the initial strategy was randomized. The variance of the three measurements was calculated as a measure of reproducibility. The quantity of presented stimuli was recorded as a measure of test time. After the elimination of starting points, absolute scotomata, and series of fields showing a significant trend during the session, 255 measured locations of 27 series were available for evaluation. The mean number of presentations (indicating test time) was 46% (dynamic strategy versus traditional strategy). The variance of the three measurements depended on the sensitivity. In the normal sensitivity range, the dynamic strategy had a markedly lower variance (58%). For relative defects, the variance was higher (141%-156%). According to a benefit/cost calculation, the efficiency of the dynamic strategy was better in all sensitivity ranges and reached a factor of 3 for high sensitivities. The dynamic strategy is considerably more efficient than the traditional strategy using fixed step sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7612076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ger J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0941-2921


  8 in total

1.  Perceptual relevance of abnormal visual field representations: static visual field perimetry in human albinism.

Authors:  Michael B Hoffmann; Petra S Seufert; Linda C Schmidtborn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Diagnostic Ability and Repeatability of a New Supra-Threshold Glaucoma Screening Program in Standard Automated Perimetry.

Authors:  Natsumi Takahashi; Kazunori Hirasawa; Miki Hoshina; Masayuki Kasahara; Kazuhiro Matsumura; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Comparison of Advanced Threshold and SITA Fast Perimetric Strategies.

Authors:  Bartosz L Sikorski; Adriana Laudencka
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Comparative Study Between the SORS and Dynamic Strategy Visual Field Testing Methods on Glaucomatous and Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Şerife Seda Kucur; Sebastian Häckel; Jan Stapelfeldt; Jeannine Odermatt; Milko E Iliev; Mathias Abegg; Raphael Sznitman; Rene Höhn
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  A Method for Reducing the Number of Presentations in Perimetric Test Procedures.

Authors:  Andrew Turpin; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.048

6.  Assessment of retinal sensitivity using a time-saving strategy in normal individuals.

Authors:  Hirotaka Suzumura; Keiji Yoshikawa; Shiro Mizoue; Ryoko Hyodo; Tairo Kimura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-09

7.  Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Masayuki Kasahara; Kazuhiro Matsumura; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sequentially optimized reconstruction strategy: A meta-strategy for perimetry testing.

Authors:  Şerife Seda Kucur; Raphael Sznitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.