Literature DB >> 7610209

The prospects of daytime running lights for reducing vehicle crashes in the United States.

A F Williams1, K A Lancaster.   

Abstract

Daytime running lights increase visual contrast between vehicles and their background, improving their noticeability and detectability. Seven countries require motor vehicles to have lights on during all daytime periods--Canada, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Studies from these and other countries have generally indicated that daytime running lights use is associated with small to moderate reductions in multiple-vehicle daytime crashes, especially those involving vehicles approaching from the front or side. There is evidence also that initial positive effects of daytime running lights do not dissipate over time, that is, there is little support for novelty or habituation effects. The bulk of the evidence suggests that running lights do not lead to increases in collisions involving pedestrians and pedalcyclists, allaying concerns that there would be negative consequences of making these road users relatively less conspicuous. Most of the studies have been conducted in countries located at latitudes that are to the north of most of the continental United States and that have longer twilight periods and generally lower ambient illumination. The concern has been expressed that running lights may lose their effectiveness in countries located at lower latitudes, such as the United States, because the lights will provide less of a contrast. General Motors Corporation and some other manufacturers are now providing running lights on new models with higher intensities than are used in Scandinavian countries. Findings in running lights studies suggest that their effect in the United States will be positive, and their introduction provides an opportunity to determine the effect. The costs of running lights are low, so even modest crash reductions would be cost effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7610209      PMCID: PMC1382112     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  6 in total

1.  AUTOMOBILE RUNNING LIGHTS--A RESEARCH REPORT.

Authors:  M J ALLEN; J R CLARK
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1964-05

2.  Perceived risks and driving behavior.

Authors:  A K Lund; B O'Neill
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1986-10

3.  Daytime headlights and position on the highway.

Authors:  M J Allen; J Strickland; B Ward; A Siegel
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1969-01

4.  The effect of daytime running lights on crashes between two vehicles in Saskatchewan: a study of a government fleet.

Authors:  G A Sparks; R D Neudorf; A E Smith; K R Wapman; P L Zador
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1993-10

5.  Driver experience with antilock brake systems.

Authors:  A F Williams; J K Wells
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1994-12

6.  The effects on accidents of compulsory use of daytime running lights for cars in Norway.

Authors:  R Elvik
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1993-08
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Daytime running lights in the USA: what is the impact on vehicle crashes in Minnesota?

Authors:  Michele E Krajicek; Raquel M Schears
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-03-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.