Literature DB >> 7607456

Correlation of DNA fragment sizes within loci in the presence of non-detectable alleles.

R Chakraborty1, Z Li.   

Abstract

At present most forensic databases of DNA profiling of individuals consist of DNA fragment sizes measured from Southern blot restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Statistical studies of these databases have revealed that, when fragment sizes are measured from RFLP analysis, some of the single-band patterns of individuals may actually be due to heterozygosity of alleles in which fragment size resulting from one allele remains undetected. In this work, we evaluate the effect of such allelic non-detectability on correlation of fragment sizes within individuals at a locus, and its impact on the inference of independence of fragment sizes within loci. We show that when non-detectable alleles are present in a population at a locus, positive correlations of fragment sizes are expected, which increase with the proportion of non-detectable alleles at the locus. Therefore, a non-zero positive correlation is not a proof of allelic dependence within individuals. Applications of this theory to the current forensic RFLP databases within the US show that there is virtually no evidence of significant allelic dependence within any of the loci. Therefore, the assumption that DNA fragment sizes within loci are independent is valid, and hence, the population genetic principles of computing DNA profile frequencies by multiplying binned frequencies of fragment sizes are most likely to be appropriate for forensic applications of DNA typing data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7607456     DOI: 10.1007/BF01441149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  32 in total

Review 1.  Population genetics in the forensic DNA debate.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Independence of VNTR alleles defined as floating bins.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  No excess of homozygosity at loci used for DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  B Devlin; N Risch; K Roeder
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-09-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Research on DNA typing catching up with courtroom application.

Authors:  E S Lander
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  DNA fingerprinting on trial.

Authors:  E S Lander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The equivalence of two tests and models for HLA data with no observed double blanks.

Authors:  J J Gart; J M Nam
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Incidence and origin of "null" alleles in the (AC)n microsatellite markers.

Authors:  D F Callen; A D Thompson; Y Shen; H A Phillips; R I Richards; J C Mulley; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Nondetectability of restriction fragments and independence of DNA fragment sizes within and between loci in RFLP typing of DNA.

Authors:  R Chakraborty; Y Zhong; L Jin; B Budowle
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Testing independence of fragment lengths within VNTR loci.

Authors:  S Geisser; W Johnson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  The efficiency of multilocus DNA fingerprint probes for individualization and establishment of family relationships, determined from extensive casework.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; M Turner; P Debenham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.