Literature DB >> 7607032

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery--are we being honest with our patients?

S D Wexner1, S M Cohen, A Ulrich, P Reissman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A survey was undertaken to assess the impact of laparoscopy on the practice of colorectal surgery.
METHODS: A total of 1,520 questionnaires were mailed to all members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; 635 (42 percent) surgeons responded, 50 percent, and indicated that one questionnaire represented their entire group practice.
RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight (47 percent) respondents currently perform laparoscopic colorectal surgery; 62 percent (171) use the laparoscope for < or = 20 percent of their bowel resections. Conversely, only 6 percent (16) use the laparoscope in over 50 percent of resections. The percentage of surgeons who perform various procedures were right colectomy, 78 percent; left colectomy, 57 percent; stoma creations, 52 percent; anterior resection, 44 percent; Hartmann's closure, 42 percent; abdominoperineal resection, 27 percent; rectopexy, 18 percent; and total colectomy, 14 percent. If the preoperative diagnosis is known to be carcinoma, 196 (71 percent) surgeons attempted laparoscopic colorectal surgery, but 55 percent of surgeons (108) operated only for early lesions and 35 percent (68) only for palliation. To enable the procedure to be laparoscopically performed, 87 percent (243) of surgeons stated that they have changed their practice to include routine use of ureteral stents (23 percent), preoperative colonoscopic marking of small lesions (40 percent), or intraoperative colonoscopy. Despite increased use of endoscopy, there were 18 patients in whom the wrong segment of colon was removed. Moreover, nine patients had early local recurrence after resection of colon cancer, nine had early local recurrence after rectal cancer resection, and five had early port-site recurrence. Although 255 (40 percent) surgeons surveyed would themselves undergo laparoscopic colorectal surgery for a rectal villous adenoma, only 38 (6 percent) would have a laparoscopic anterior resection for cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Several important problems exist including early port-site recurrence and a dual surgical standard. Although many surgeons are eager to practice laparoscopic colorectal surgery on their patients with carcinoma, they are reluctant to have the new technique applied to themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7607032     DOI: 10.1007/BF02048029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  32 in total

1.  Laparoscopic ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease associated with intestinal stenosis and ileorectal fistula.

Authors:  M Watanabe; M Ohgami; T Teramoto; T Hibi; M Kitajima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Challenges of laparoscopic resection of abdominal neuroblastoma with lymphadenectomy. A preliminary report.

Authors:  T Iwanaka; M Arai; M Ito; H Kawashima; K Matoba; S Imaizumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective.

Authors:  Beat M Künzli; Helmut Friess; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-27

4.  Intraoperative fluoroscopy vs. intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography for early colorectal cancer localization in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Koichi Nagata; Shungo Endo; Kishiko Tatsukawa; Shin-ei Kudo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Outcomes in 132 patients following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer with greater than 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  John H Marks; Renee Huang; Dominique McKeever; Morgan Greenfield
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Correlation between preoperative endoscopic and intraoperative findings in localizing colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Martine Adam Louis; Kalyana Nandipati; Rakel Astorga; Anupa Mandava; Carl-P Rousseau; Neil Mandava
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  When You Operate on Friends and Relatives: Results of a Survey among Surgeons.

Authors:  Jurgen Knuth; Dirk Rolf Bulian; Jörg Ansorg; Peter Büchler
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; Lisa Martin Hawver; Ziad Awad; Dimitrios Stefanidis; William Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus contrast medium vs PEG alone preparation for CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in preoperative colorectal cancer staging.

Authors:  Koichi Nagata; Shungo Endo; Tamaki Ichikawa; Keisuke Dasai; Katsuyuki Moriya; Tamio Kushihashi; Shin-ei Kudo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Preoperative localization of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sergio A Acuna; Maryam Elmi; Prakesh S Shah; Natalie G Coburn; Fayez A Quereshy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.