Literature DB >> 7606202

Utilization of ovarian cancer screening by women at increased risk.

M Schwartz1, C Lerman, M Daly, J Audrain, A Masny, K Griffith.   

Abstract

Our objective was to identify demographic, medical, and psychological correlates of ovarian cancer screening utilization in a sample of women at increased risk. We designed a cross-sectional study that evaluated demographic factors, risk factors, psychological factors, and utilization of ovarian cancer screening in first-degree relatives of ovarian cancer patients. In multivariable analysis, use of CA-125 was associated with number of affected relatives [odds ratio (OR), 2.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.3-6.5] and ovarian cancer worries (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1-8.1). For ultrasound (transvaginal or abdominal), the model included employment status (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.8) and ovarian cancer worries (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2-9.1). Significant interaction terms in the ultrasound models indicated that employment was a significant predictor of ultrasound utilization in women with 2 or more affected relatives. Among women with only one affected relative, ultrasound use was strongly associated with the presence of ovarian cancer worries. Utilization of ovarian cancer screening among women at increased risk is influenced by psychological and sociodemographic factors, in addition to level of risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7606202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  8 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of choosing life-long screening or prophylactic surgery in women at high and moderate risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J R J De Leeuw; M J van Vliet; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Factors associated with return for routine annual screening in an ovarian cancer screening program.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski; Mei Zhang; Edward J Pavlik; Richard J Kryscio
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Incorporating a Psychological Counselor in a Cancer Risk Assessment Program: Necessity, Acceptability, and Potential Roles.

Authors:  Alicia K Matthews; Dana L Brandenburg; Shelly Cummings; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Dispositional cancer worry: convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of existing scales.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Jennifer K Bernat; LaShara A Davis; Robert Yale
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2010

5.  Illness representations of lung cancer, lung cancer worry, and perceptions of risk by smoking status.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Kelly D Blake; Bradford W Hesse; Erik M Augustson; Sarah Evans
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Adherence to breast and ovarian cancer screening recommendations for female relatives from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Michael A Campitelli; Anna M Chiarelli; Lucia Mirea; Lindsay Stewart; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Relationships between decisional balance and stage of adopting mammography and Pap testing among Chinese American women.

Authors:  Carol Strong; Wenchi Liang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The influence of culture and cancer worry on colon cancer screening among older Chinese-American women.

Authors:  Judy Huei-Yu Wang; Wenchi Liang; Mei-Yuh Chen; Jennifer Cullen; Shibao Feng; Bin Yi; Marc D Schwartz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.847

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.