Literature DB >> 7604345

Interlaminar shear stresses and laminae separation in a disc. Finite element analysis of the L3-L4 motion segment subjected to axial compressive loads.

V K Goel1, B T Monroe, L G Gilbertson, P Brinckmann.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study analyzed interlaminar shear stresses across the laminae of a ligamentous L3-L4 motion segment. A three-dimensional finite element model of the motion segment was developed and its response in axial compression mode was predicted.
OBJECTIVES: The contributions of "mechanical" factors in producing laminae separation in a disc are not well understood, especially when the nucleus is still gel-like in appearance (stage 1 of disc degeneration). All types of stresses are likely to contribute to laminae separation. The authors believe it is partially due to the interlaminar shear stresses at the laminae interfaces in specific regions of an intact disc because the disc is a composite structure. The effects of anular tears on the interlaminar shear stresses were also investigated. These tears can be circumferential or radial in nature, and commonly occur in the aged, degenerated disc. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A large number of biomechanical studies dealing with the role of the disc vis-a-vis other spinal components have been reported in the literature. The role of mechanical factors, however, in producing laminae separation, especially when the nucleus is still gel-like in appearance (stage 1 of disc degeneration), is not entirely clear.
METHODS: A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of an intact L3-L4 lumbar motion segment, based on the use of a special type of element for the disc anulus, was created to investigate the interlaminar shear stresses in the anulus. The effects of radial "out-in," radial "in-out," and "circumferential" injuries were analyzed. Injury was modeled as element removal in the posterolateral portion of the disc. Models subjected to axial compressive loads, ranging from 200 N to 2000 N, were analyzed. In addition to the interlaminar shear stresses, disc bulge, and displacements including coupled motions were predicted.
RESULTS: The theoretical disc bulge predictions for the radial in-out injury case were in agreement with the disc bulge data obtained experimentally. Displacements, disc bulge, and coupled motions increased with injury, as expected. The interlaminar shear stresses were highest in the posterolateral portions of the intact disc model. Interlaminar shear stresses, in general, increased with injury. Also, a slight increase in circumferential injury was sufficient to see a substantial increase in interlaminar shear stresses.
CONCLUSIONS: The interlaminar shear stresses being higher in the posterolateral regions of the intact disc reinforces that, from clinical studies, tears originate in the posterolateral portion of the disc. The large interlaminar shear stresses, caused by asymmetry in the disc structure due to injury, along with chemical and structural changes in the disc with age, may be an important cause of further degeneration through laminae separation. This is the case for traditional composite laminates. This study points out the importance of interlaminar shear stresses to gain further understanding of the role of mechanical factors in producing disc degeneration, especially delamination of the anulus. Clinical relevance of the findings and possible relationship to the aging process are explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7604345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  55 in total

1.  Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics.

Authors:  T Zander; A Rohlmann; C Klöckner; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Mechanisms for mechanical damage in the intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus.

Authors:  J C James C Iatridis; Iolo ap Gwynn
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Replacing the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disk: prediction of suitable properties of a replacement material using finite element analysis.

Authors:  J R Meakin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Comparison of the biomechanical effects of posterior and anterior spine-stabilizing implants.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; T Zander; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Three dimensional finite element analysis of the pediatric lumbar spine. Part II: biomechanical change as the initiating factor for pediatric isthmic spondylolisthesis at the growth plate.

Authors:  Koichi Sairyo; Vijay K Goel; Akiyoshi Masuda; Srilakshmi Vishnubhotla; Ahmad Faizan; Ashok Biyani; Nabil Ebraheim; Daisuke Yonekura; Ri-Ichi Murakami; Tomoya Terai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  Yabo Guan; Narayan Yoganandan; Jiangyue Zhang; Frank A Pintar; Joesph F Cusick; Christopher E Wolfla; Dennis J Maiman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  The role of the facet capsular ligament in providing spinal stability.

Authors:  Emily A Bermel; Victor H Barocas; Arin M Ellingson
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 8.  Biomechanics of intervertebral disk degeneration.

Authors:  Nozomu Inoue; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Changes in the interfacial shear resistance of disc annulus fibrosus from genipin crosslinking.

Authors:  Bryan Kirking; Thomas Hedman; John Criscione
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Pharmacological enhancement of disc diffusion and differentiation of healthy, ageing and degenerated discs : Results from in-vivo serial post-contrast MRI studies in 365 human lumbar discs.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; K Venkatadass; J Naresh Babu; K Ganesh; Ajoy P Shetty
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.