Literature DB >> 7603281

Measurements of cross-sectional area of the nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry and CT scanning.

Y G Min1, Y J Jang.   

Abstract

The authors aimed to evaluate the validity and characteristics of acoustic rhinometic tests by comparing the results with those of computed tomography (CT) of the nasal cavity. Cross-sectional areas along the nasal cavity were measured by acoustic rhinometry (AR) and CT of the nasal cavity in 30 normal subjects. Cross-sectional areas measured by each technique showed a statistically significant correlation. The two measurements showed a better linear correlation in the anterior part of the nasal cavity up to 24 mm from the nostril than in the posterior part of the nasal cavity beyond that point. Mean cross-sectional areas measured by AR were constantly less than those measured by CT of the nasal cavity up to 33 mm from the nostril, whereas areas measured by AR were greater than those measured by CT scans beyond that point.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7603281     DOI: 10.1288/00005537-199507000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  10 in total

1.  Confirming nasal airway dimensions observed on panoramic and posterior-anterior cephalometric radiographs using an acoustic rhinometer.

Authors:  J Landa; A Rich; M Finkelman
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-06

2.  Video-endoscopy and digital image analysis of the nasal valve area.

Authors:  Tilman Keck; Richard Leiacker; Stephan Kühnemann; Jörg Lindemann; Ajnacska Rozsasi; Nina Wantia
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The role of three-dimensional CT in the evaluation of nasal structures and anomalies.

Authors:  Gennaro Graviero; Luca Guastini; Renzo Mora; Giovanni Salzano; Francesco Antonio Salzano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The nasal airways response in normal subjects to oxymetazoline spray: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  L Bickford; S Shakib; D Taverner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  The relationship between nasal resistance to airflow and the airspace minimal cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Guilherme J M Garcia; Benjamin M Hariri; Ruchin G Patel; John S Rhee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Acoustic reflection: review and clinical applications for sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  John S Viviano
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Comparison of the effects of RME and fan-type RME on nasal airway by using acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  Oral Sökücü; Cenk Doruk; O Ismail Uysal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Acoustic rhinometry and video endoscopic scoring to evaluate postoperative outcomes in endonasal spreader graft surgery with septoplasty and turbinoplasty for nasal valve collapse.

Authors:  Bree Erickson; Robert Hurowitz; Caroline Jeffery; Khalid Ansari; Hamdy El Hakim; Erin D Wright; Hadi Seikaly; Sam R Greig; David W J Côté
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-01-12

9.  Assessing the Clinical Value of Performing CT Scan before Rhinoplasty Surgery.

Authors:  Hesam Jahandideh; Mojtaba Maleki Delarestaghi; Delaram Jan; Ayda Sanaei
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-18

10.  Acoustic rhinometry: anatomic correlation of the first two notches found in the nasal echogram.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Nazareth Nigro; Josiane Faria de Aguiar Nigro; Richard Louis Voegels; Olavo Mion; João Ferreira Mello Junior
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-08-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.