PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the combined insults of hemorrhagic shock and aortic clamping simulating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair had a synergistic effect on the production of pulmonary injury, indicating remote organ injury. METHODS: Animals were randomized to one of three groups, infrarenal clamp plus 1 hour of shock, infrarenal clamp plus 2 hours of shock, and supramesenteric clamp plus 1 hour of shock. Each of these groups had four subgroups; sham, shock (mean arterial pressure of 50 mm Hg), clamp, or combined [shock plus clamp]). All animals had a laparotomy with aortic clamping in only the clamp and combined groups. Five hours after clamp removal lung permeability index and neutrophil sequestration were quantified. RESULTS: Lung permeability index (6.60 +/- 0.63, p < 0.05 vs all other groups) and neutrophil sequestration (3.72 +/- 0.45 vs sham and clamp, p < 0.05) were significantly increased when shock and supramesenteric clamp were combined. After 1 or 2 hours of shock and infrarenal clamping, no increase in lung permeability index was noted, although neutrophil sequestration was increased in the 2-hour shock group. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the additive effect of shock and supramesenteric clamping, which initiated a cascade of injurious events that resulted in a rapid pulmonary injury. The high mortality rate related to remote organ failure in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm may be related to the synergy of these two injurious processes.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the combined insults of hemorrhagic shock and aortic clamping simulating ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair had a synergistic effect on the production of pulmonary injury, indicating remote organ injury. METHODS: Animals were randomized to one of three groups, infrarenal clamp plus 1 hour of shock, infrarenal clamp plus 2 hours of shock, and supramesenteric clamp plus 1 hour of shock. Each of these groups had four subgroups; sham, shock (mean arterial pressure of 50 mm Hg), clamp, or combined [shock plus clamp]). All animals had a laparotomy with aortic clamping in only the clamp and combined groups. Five hours after clamp removal lung permeability index and neutrophil sequestration were quantified. RESULTS: Lung permeability index (6.60 +/- 0.63, p < 0.05 vs all other groups) and neutrophil sequestration (3.72 +/- 0.45 vs sham and clamp, p < 0.05) were significantly increased when shock and supramesenteric clamp were combined. After 1 or 2 hours of shock and infrarenal clamping, no increase in lung permeability index was noted, although neutrophil sequestration was increased in the 2-hour shock group. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the additive effect of shock and supramesenteric clamping, which initiated a cascade of injurious events that resulted in a rapid pulmonary injury. The high mortality rate related to remote organ failure in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm may be related to the synergy of these two injurious processes.