| Literature DB >> 32864929 |
Şaban Ergene1, Doğuş Hemşinli1, Sedat Ozan Karakişi1, Tolga Mercantepe2, Levent Tumkaya2, Adnan Yilmaz3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the biochemical and histopathological renal effects of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury using a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) model in rats and to investigate the potential protective effects of whortleberry (Vaccinium myrtillus).Entities:
Keywords: Aorta, Abdominal; Apoptosis; Laparotomy; Malondialdehyde; Oxidative Stress; Renal Artery; Sodium Chloride
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32864929 PMCID: PMC7454617 DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ISSN: 0102-7638
Tubular necrosis score classification by Sung MJ et al.[21]
| Score | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|
| Impairment of brush margin structure in proximal tubules | |
| 0 | No damage |
| 1 | ≤ 10% |
| 2 | 10-25% |
| 3 | 26-75% |
| 4 | ≥ 75% |
| Atypical apical membranes (blebbing) | |
| 0 | No damage |
| 1 | ≤ 10% |
| 2 | 10-25% |
| 3 | 26-75% |
| 4 | ≥ 75% |
| Loss of connections between tubular epithelial cells or through the basal membrane (debris accumulation within the lumen) | |
| 0 | No damage |
| 1 | ≤ 10% |
| 2 | 10-25% |
| 3 | 26-75% |
| 4 | ≥ 75% |
Biochemical analysis results (mean±standard deviation).
| Groups | MDA (µmol/g) in tissue | GSH (µmol/g) in tissue |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.32±0.13 | 34.29±1.34 |
| Sham | 0.35±0.14[ | 29.51±1.55[ |
| I/R | 0.36±0.17[ | 30.31±1.43[ |
| I/R+whortleberry (Wb) | 0.33±0.19[ | 33.59±2.66[ |
Tukey's honestly significant difference test (or Tukey's HSD test):
P=0.01 control group compared to the glycerol group,
P=0.00 control group compared to the I/R group,
P=0.015 I/R group compared to the I/R+Wb group,
v=0.00 control group compared to the glycerol group,
P=0.02 control group compared to the I/R group, and
P=0.13 I/R group compared to the I/R+WB group.
Grading of Caspase-3 staining positivity scores.
| Grade | |
|---|---|
| 1 | None (< 25%) |
| 2 | Mild (25-50%) |
| 3 | Moderate (50-75%) |
| 4 | Severe (> 75%) |
Caspase-3 positive grade scores data (median±standard deviation).
| Group | Scores |
|---|---|
| Control | 0.00±0.46 |
| Sham | 3.00±0.53[ |
| I/R | 3.50±0.35[ |
| I/R+whortleberry | 1.00±0.52 |
Kruskal-Wallis test/Tamhane's T2 test:
P=0.00 compared to the control group,
P=0.00 compared to the I/R group,
P=0.03 compared to the control group.
Fig. 1Light microscopic image of immunohistochemical staining. Caspase-3. A (´20): sections from the control group show a normal structure in proximal and distal tubule epithelial cells (arrow) (Caspase-3 positivity score=0.00±0.46). B (´20): sham group sections showing intense Caspase-3 positivity in proximal and distal tubule epithelial cells (arrow) (Caspase-3 positivity score=3.00±0.53). C (´20): sections from the I/R group showing intense Caspase-3 positivity in proximal and distal tubule epithelial cells (Caspase-3 positivity score=3.50±0.35). D (´20): sections from the whortleberry treatment group showing a typical structure in proximal and distal tubule epithelial cells, with slight Caspase-3 positivity in epithelial cells (tailed arrow) (Caspase-3 positivity score=1.00±0.52). I/R=ischemia/reperfusion
Tubular necrosis scores (TNS) analysis result data (median±standard deviation).
| Groups | Brush margin damage score | Atypical apical membrane score (blebbing) | Debris accumulation within the lumen score | TNS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.00±0.29 | 0.00±0.49 | 0.00±0.35 | 1.00±076 |
| Sham | 3.00±0.585[ | 3.00±0.54[ | 2.50±0.35[ | 8.00±0.69[ |
| I/R | 3.00±0.38[ | 2.00±0.54[ | 3.00±0.54d | 8.00±1.35[ |
| I/R+whortleberry | 1.00±0.69[ | 1.00±0.76[ | 0.00±0.35 | 2.00±0.49[ |
Kruskal-Wallis test/Tamhane's T2 test:
P=0.00 compared with the control group,
P=0.00 compared with the I/R group,
P=0.03 compared with the I/R group,
P=0.012 compared with the control group.
Fig. 2Microscopic image of kidney tissue. H&E staining of proximal tubule (p), distal tubule (d), glomerule (g), and brush margin (arrow). A (´20) and B (´40): normal glomerular (g), proximal tubule (p), and distal tubule (d) structures in control group sections. The brush margin structure (arrow) in the proximal tubules is clearly defined (TNS=1.00±076). C (´20) and D (´40): sections from the sham group show diffuse atypical glomerules (ag) and numerous necrotic tubule epithelial cells with loss of brush margins (spiral arrow). Vascular congestion (arrowhead) can be seen in interstitial spaces (curly arrow), together with inflammation (tailed arrow) (TNS=8.00±0.69). E (´10) and F (´20): sections from the I/R group show an atypical glomerulus (ag) structure and debris accumulation (star) in the tubular lumen. Numerous atypical proximal tubules with loss of brush margins (arrow) can also be seen. Leukocyte infiltration can be seen in interstitial spaces (tailed arrow) (TNS=8.00±1.35). G (´20) and H (´40): sections from the whortleberry group show glomerules (g) and proximal tubules (p) with a normal brush margin structure (TNS=2.00±0.49).
I/R=ischemia/reperfusion; TNS=tubular necrosis score
| Abbreviations, acronyms & symbols | |
|---|---|
| ANOVA | = Analysis of variance |
| GSH | = Glutathione |
| HPS | = Histopathological score |
| HSD | = Honestly significant difference |
| IP | = Intraperitoneal |
| I/R | = Ischemia/reperfusion |
| MAP | = Mean arterial pressure |
| MDA | = Malondialdehyde |
| RAAA | = Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm |
| ROS | = Reactive oxygen radicals |
| SOD | = Superoxide dismutase |
| SPSS | = Statistical Package for the Social Sciences |
| TNS | = Tubular necrosis scores |
| Wb | = Whortleberry |
| Author's roles & responsibilities | |
|---|---|
| SE | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| DH | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| SOK | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |
| SOK | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published |
| LT | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published |
| AY | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published |