Literature DB >> 7602395

Closeness of fit of uncemented stems improves the strain distribution in the femur.

J Hua1, P S Walker.   

Abstract

Differences in the cross-sectional shapes of intramedullary stems are expected to affect the strains in the femur, a close proximal fit being proposed as particularly advantageous. We compared uncemented femoral stems of different designs, as well as a cemented stem, using the intact femur as a control. The collarless stems were custom-made, standard asymmetric, symmetric (i.e., neutral), and cemented symmetric. These different types of stem were inserted in sequence into eight cadaver femurs. A photoelastic coating technique was used to give a measure of the shear strains over the bone surface. The mean reductions of maximum shear strains in the upper 30 mm of the proximal-medial regions for the custom, asymmetric, symmetric, and cemented stems were 11, 24, 6, and 75%, respectively. The strains for the symmetric stem were concentrated in the proximal-medial region just below the neck resection line and then decreased rapidly below that level. For the asymmetric stems, the relative strains in the proximal-anterior and proximal-medial regions were dependent on the tightness of fit in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions. The custom stems consistently produced a pattern of strain distribution that, overall, was closer to normal than that of the other stems; extremes at the anterior and medial regions were avoided. The strains down the entire medial side of the cemented stem were significantly less than for the intact femur or for the uncemented stems.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7602395     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100130307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  12 in total

1.  Periprosthetic modelling of femoral component fit using computed tomography data for total hip arthroplasty: a feasibility study.

Authors:  D A Hauser-Kara; D L Bartel
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem.

Authors:  Alex Leali; Joseph F Fetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The Adaptiva custom-made stem--our reasons for not using it anymore.

Authors:  Patrik Karl Reize; Nikolaus Wülker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Custom cementless THA in patients with skeletal dysplasia results in lower apparent revision rates than other types of femoral fixation.

Authors:  Mathew D Sewell; Sammy A Hanna; Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood; Stephen R Cannon; Timothy W R Briggs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11

6.  Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custom-made femoral stems: 37 patients followed for 3 years.

Authors:  Carlina V Albanese; Francesco S Santori; Laura Pavan; Ian D Learmonth; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Interest of short implants in hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: comparative study "uncemented short" vs "cemented conventional" femoral stems.

Authors:  Mehdi Miladi; Benoît Villain; Nasser Mebtouche; Thierry Bégué; Jean-Charles Aurégan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Differences in external and internal cortical strain with prosthesis in the femur.

Authors:  Olav Reikeras; Gudrun T Aarnes; Harald Steen; Per Ludvigsen; Geir Sagvolden
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-11-18

9.  Anthropometric measurements to design best-fit femoral stem for the Indian population.

Authors:  Br Rawal; Rahul Ribeiro; Rajesh Malhotra; Naresh Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 10.  Periprosthetic bone loss: diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Loredana Cavalli; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.