Literature DB >> 12507314

Periprosthetic modelling of femoral component fit using computed tomography data for total hip arthroplasty: a feasibility study.

D A Hauser-Kara1, D L Bartel.   

Abstract

The aim of the work was to create a new three-dimensional periprosthetic multi-criteria optimisation technique to identify the best six degrees of freedom transform to position a porous-coated anatomic cementless femoral component for three factors, including: first, maximisation of the degree of contact achieved between designated bone ingrowth surfaces and the periprosthetic bone; secondly, minimisation of the bone mass to be removed to accommodate the component and thirdly, the extreme constraint of the component to be positioned so that it does not project beyond the periosteum. Discrete integrals were computed over regions of interest derived from the polyhedral component mesh in transaxial CT scan planes, using a polygon scan-conversion algorithm. A new biomedical imaging volume rendering technique utilising dynamic virtual textures was developed to visualise the design trade-offs. Pareto-optima were identified for four femora that matched an average-sized component. The non-linear, multi-modal fit metric was quadratic near minima, with a narrow trough of equivalent fit values within 3mm of translation and 3 degrees of rotation with respect to the canal axis, and possessed a dependence most pronounced for distal-directed insertion against varus/valgus rotation. The study gives previously unavailable data on the three-dimensional femoral component fit and is the first report that demonstrates that fitting the implant using several design criteria in a multi-criteria optimisation scheme is feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12507314     DOI: 10.1007/bf02345302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  26 in total

1.  The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue.

Authors:  D T Reilly; A H Burstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Five-year follow-up evaluation of the noncemented press-fit titanium hip-joint endoprosthesis.

Authors:  F Seral; J M Villar; A Esteller; F G Vivar; I Abad; M Martinez Grande; E Jorda; E Espinar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A knowledge-based computer-aided design and manufacturing system for total hip replacement.

Authors:  J D Reuben; C H Chang; J E Akin; D R Lionberger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Fit the patient to the prosthesis. An argument against the routine use of custom hip implants.

Authors:  W N Capello
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Fit and fill: fashionable fact or fantasy?

Authors:  G Horne
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-01

6.  Results of the Harris-Galante cementless hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Y H Kim; V E Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-01

7.  A comparison of three varieties of noncemented porous-coated hip replacement.

Authors:  R J Haddad; S D Cook; M R Brinker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-01

8.  Mathematical shape optimization of hip prosthesis design.

Authors:  R Huiskes; R Boeklagen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Strategies for improving fixation of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Poss; P Walker; M Spector; D T Reilly; D D Robertson; C B Sledge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The ROBODOC clinical trial: a robotic assistant for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  E H Spencer
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.