Literature DB >> 7600748

Assessing the impact of blood sample type on the estimated prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus in epidemiological surveys.

M Farrer1, C J Albers, H A Neil, P C Adams, M F Laker, K G Alberti.   

Abstract

In a prospective study of 353 patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed at 3 months and 12 months after surgery. Venous whole blood glucose and venous plasma glucose samples were assayed on a bench-top analyser. The World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus were applied to venous whole blood glucose and venous plasma glucose measurements. The difference between the plasma and whole blood concentration of glucose was 0.79-0.86 mmol l-1 at a plasma glucose of 7.8 mmol l-1 and 1.22-1.24 mmol l-1 at a plasma glucose of 11.1 mmol l-1 (compared to 1.1 mmol l-1 by World Health Organization criteria at both cut-points). Despite this, in our subject population with a high prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (20.3% at 3 months, 15.3% at 12 months) and diabetes mellitus (10.1% at 3 months and 12 months), there was no significant difference in the proportion classified impaired glucose tolerance or having diabetes mellitus using venous whole blood glucose compared to venous plasma glucose. We conclude that despite the minor anomaly between WHO diagnostic criteria based on venous whole blood glucose and venous plasma glucose measurements, these criteria are robust and give broadly comparable population prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance irrespective of blood sample choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7600748     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00486.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  4 in total

Review 1.  Challenges of inpatient blood glucose monitoring: standards, methods, and devices to measure blood glucose.

Authors:  Kathie L Hermayer; Aundrea S Loftley; Sumana Reddy; Satya Nandana Narla; Nina A Epps; Yusheng Zhu
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results.

Authors:  Ksenia Tonyushkina; James H Nichols
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

3.  Comparability of hemoglobin A1c level measured in capillary versus venous blood sample applying two point-of-care instruments.

Authors:  Tahereh Keramati; Farideh Razi; Ali Tootee; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2014-10-30

Review 4.  Glucose biosensors in clinical practice: principles, limits and perspectives of currently used devices.

Authors:  Salvatore Andrea Pullano; Marta Greco; Maria Giovanna Bianco; Daniela Foti; Antonio Brunetti; Antonino S Fiorillo
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 11.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.