Literature DB >> 7600168

Reconstruction of the valgus-impacted humeral head fracture.

H Resch1, E Beck, I Bayley.   

Abstract

Between 1985 and 1991, 22 patients (average age 52 years, range 26 to 65 years) with severely impacted humeral head fractures were operated on with the aim of preserving the humeral head. All 22 cases showed no significant lateral displacement. Thus it was assumed that the periosteum leading medially to the humeral head was intact and that the vessels passing through the periosteum would ensure survival of the humeral head segment. All patients underwent treatment with open reduction. The impacted segment of the humeral head was raised, the tuberosities were relocated, and the void was filled with chips of cancellous bone. This procedure provided fixation with minimal osteosynthesis. At follow-up evaluation (minimum 18 months, average 36 months) one patient had sequestration of the head segment, and another patient had clinically asymptomatic partial necrosis. None of the remaining 20 patients showed signs of necrosis. Slight arthrosis was present in two patients, and moderate arthrosis was present in one. A correlation was found between the functional result and the quality of reduction. Where anatomic reconstruction had been successful, the long-term functional result was almost identical with the nontraumatized side.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7600168     DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(05)80071-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  20 in total

1.  Da Vinci System: clinical experience with complex proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Valeria Visconti; Luigi Vernaglia Lombardi; Michele Ciccarelli; Fabio Cautiero
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2010-05

2.  Displaced proximal humeral fractures: an Indian experience with locking plates.

Authors:  Sameer Aggarwal; Kamal Bali; Mandeep S Dhillon; Vishal Kumar; Aditya K Mootha
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Fracture of the proximal humerus with disruption of the tendon of the pectoralis major.

Authors:  Bart M Berghs; Alexander Van Tongel; Thomas De Bo; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

4.  Endosteal strut augment reduces complications associated with proximal humeral locking plates.

Authors:  Andrew S Neviaser; Carolyn M Hettrich; Brandon S Beamer; Joshua S Dines; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Valgus impacted proximal humeral fractures and their blood supply after transosseous suturing.

Authors:  Andreas M Panagopoulos; P Dimakopoulos; M Tyllianakis; D Karnabatidis; D Siablis; A X Papadopoulos; E Lambiris; P Kraniotis; G Sakellaropoulos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate and fibular strut allograft.

Authors:  Karnav Panchal; Jae-Jung Jeong; Sang-Eun Park; Weon-Yoo Kim; Hyung-Ki Min; Ju-Yeong Kim; Jong-Hun Ji
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The amount of impaction and loss of reduction in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures after surgical fixation.

Authors:  S Carbone; M Papalia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  [Humeral head replacement in acute proximal humerus fractures].

Authors:  M Tauber; P Magosch; P Habermeyer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  [Reduction techniques for minimally invasive stabilization of proximal humeral fractures].

Authors:  F J P Beeres; O M Quaile; B C Link; R Babst
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.154

10.  Effect of osteosynthesis, primary hemiarthroplasty, and non-surgical management for displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly: a multi-centre, randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Stig Brorson; Bo Sanderhoff Olsen; Lars Henrik Frich; Steen Lund Jensen; Hans Viggo Johannsen; Anne Kathrine Sørensen; Asbjørn Hrobjartsson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.