Literature DB >> 7599584

Structured abstracts in MEDLINE, 1989-1991.

A M Harbourt1, L S Knecht, B L Humphreys.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the structured abstracts in biomedical journals indexed in MEDLINE over a three-year period as an initial step in exploring their utility in enhancing bibliographic retrieval.
DESIGN: The study examined the occurrence of structured abstracts in MEDLINE from March 1989 to December 1991, characteristics of MEDLINE records for articles with structured abstracts, editorial policies of six selected MEDLINE journals on structured abstracts, and a sample of twenty-five structured abstracts from the six journals.
RESULTS: The study revealed that the number of structured abstracts in MEDLINE and the number of MEDLINE journals publishing structured abstracts increased substantially between 1989 and 1991. On average, articles with structured abstracts had more access points (Medical Subject Heading [MeSH] terms and text words) than MEDLINE articles as a whole. The average length of the structured abstract was greater than the average length of all abstracts in MEDLINE.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of structured abstracts may be associated with other article characteristics that lead to the assignment of a higher average number of MeSH headings or may itself contribute to the assignment of more headings. The variations in the structured-abstract formats prescribed by different journals may complicate the exploitation of these abstracts in bibliographic retrieval systems. More research is needed on a number of questions related to the quality and utility of structured abstracts.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7599584      PMCID: PMC226026     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  10 in total

1.  [The structured summary: a tool for reader and author].

Authors:  M L Comans; A J Overbeke
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1990-12-01

2.  Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-02-09

3.  Quality of abstracts of original research articles in CMAJ in 1989.

Authors:  L Narine; D S Yee; T R Einarson; A L Ilersich
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  More informative abstracts revisited.

Authors:  R B Haynes; C D Mulrow; E J Huth; D G Altman; M J Gardner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  A proposal for more informative abstracts of review articles.

Authors:  C D Mulrow; S B Thacker; J A Pugh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Authors:  A Taddio; T Pain; F F Fassos; H Boon; A L Ilersich; T R Einarson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  More informative abstracts: current status and evaluation.

Authors:  R B Haynes
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts.

Authors:  P Froom; J Froom
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  More informative abstracts of articles describing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  R S Hayward; M C Wilson; S R Tunis; E B Bass; H R Rubin; R B Haynes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  Reporting and concordance of methodologic criteria between abstracts and articles in diagnostic test studies.

Authors:  C A Estrada; R M Bloch; D Antonacci; L L Basnight; S R Patel; S C Patel; W Wiese
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Evidence-based librarianship: an overview.

Authors:  J D Eldredge
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2000-10

3.  Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews.

Authors:  J Hartley
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2000-10

4.  Increasing access to Latin American social medicine resources: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Holly Shipp Buchanan; Howard Waitzkin; Jonathan Eldredge; Russ Davidson; Celia Iriart; Janis Teal
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2003-10

5.  Database searches for qualitative research.

Authors:  David Evans
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-07

Review 6.  Current findings from research on structured abstracts.

Authors:  James Hartley
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-07

7.  CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  David Moher; Sally Hopewell; Kenneth F Schulz; Victor Montori; Peter C Gøtzsche; P J Devereaux; Diana Elbourne; Matthias Egger; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

8.  Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract.

Authors:  Takeo Nakayama; Nobuko Hirai; Shigeaki Yamazaki; Mariko Naito
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-04

9.  A retrospective cohort study of structured abstracts in MEDLINE, 1992-2006.

Authors:  Anna M Ripple; James G Mork; Lou S Knecht; Betsy L Humphreys
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2011-04

Review 10.  Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wager; Philippa Middleton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.