Literature DB >> 7597929

The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans.

P Jaśkowski1, K Rybarczyk, F Jaroszyk, D Lemański.   

Abstract

The force needed to press the key in a simple reaction time task was measured as a function of stimulus intensity for visual and auditory stimuli in three experiments using a total 45 male and female human subjects. Intensity ranged from 0.316 to 1995 cd/m2 for visual stimuli and from ranged from 47 to 102 dB for auditory stimuli. We found, in agreement with Angel's (1973) original study, that for auditory stimuli higher intensity is accompanied by a larger force. Surprisingly, in the case of visual stimuli the intensity does not influence the force. These findings are explained by the assumption that the changes of force reflect the changes of unspecific activation level evoked by immediate arousal. Thus, the different behaviour of force for these two modalities is in agreement with the common view that loud auditory stimuli are arousing while intense visual ones are not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7597929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)        ISSN: 0065-1400            Impact factor:   1.579


  11 in total

1.  At what stage of manual visual reaction time does interhemispheric transmission occur: controlled or ballistic?

Authors:  C Cavina-Pratesi; E Bricolo; B Pellegrini; C A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissociations of spatial congruence effects across response measures: an examination of delta plots.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Nora M Roüast
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-12

3.  Does the semantic activation of quantity representations influence motor parameters?

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Corticospinal modulation induced by sounds depends on action preparedness.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Simranjit Sidhu; Stephan Riek
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The early release of actions by loud sounds in muscles with distinct connectivity.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Stephan Riek; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity.

Authors:  P Jaskowski; K Rybarczyk; F Jaroszyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

7.  Response abilities of children with Down Syndrome and other intellectual developmental disorders.

Authors:  Pratiksha Tilak Rao; Vasudeva Guddattu; John Michael Solomon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Doing better than your best: loud auditory stimulation yields improvements in maximal voluntary force.

Authors:  Anam Anzak; Huiling Tan; Alek Pogosyan; Peter Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Interhemispheric interactions and redundancy gain: tests of an interhemispheric inhibition hypothesis.

Authors:  Jeff Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Startle auditory stimuli enhance the performance of fast dynamic contractions.

Authors:  Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo; Dan Río-Rodríguez; Eliseo Iglesias-Soler; Rafael M Acero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.