M D Jensen1. 1. Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: These studies were conducted to determine whether men and women differ with regards to their overnight postabsorptive (basal) and postprandial fatty acid kinetics. Systemic oleate turnover ([9,10(3)H]oleate) was measured before and after the consumption of a mixed meal. Leg and splanchnic free fatty acid (FFA) uptake and release were measured, allowing the calculation of upper-body subcutaneous FFA release. RESULTS: basal oleate flux was virtually identical in men and women (3.0 +/- 3 versus 2.9 +/- 0.4 mumol.kg FFM-1.min-1), however, oleate Ra suppressed more in women than in men following meal ingestion (0.5 +/- 0.1 versus 0.8 +/- 0.1 mumol.kg FFM-1.min-1, P < 0.05). The fractional contribution of basal, regional FFA release to total FFA flux was not significantly different between men and women. In contrast, oleate release by upper-body subcutaneous adipose tissue was significantly greater (30 +/- 5 vs 8 +/- 3 mumol/min, respectively, P < 0.01) in men than in women during the meal nadir of FFA flux, whereas splanchnic oleate release was a greater percentage (39 +/- 7% vs 20 +/- 3%, respectively, P < 0.05) of nadir oleate Ra in women than in men. Thus, normal weight men and women differ significantly in the postprandial regulation of adipose tissue lipolysis in that men's upper-body subcutaneous adipose tissue is more resistant to the antilipolytic effects of meal ingestion. Differential regulation of regional adipose tissue lipolysis could contribute to the gender based differences in body fat distribution.
UNLABELLED: These studies were conducted to determine whether men and women differ with regards to their overnight postabsorptive (basal) and postprandial fatty acid kinetics. Systemic oleate turnover ([9,10(3)H]oleate) was measured before and after the consumption of a mixed meal. Leg and splanchnic free fatty acid (FFA) uptake and release were measured, allowing the calculation of upper-body subcutaneous FFA release. RESULTS: basal oleate flux was virtually identical in men and women (3.0 +/- 3 versus 2.9 +/- 0.4 mumol.kg FFM-1.min-1), however, oleate Ra suppressed more in women than in men following meal ingestion (0.5 +/- 0.1 versus 0.8 +/- 0.1 mumol.kg FFM-1.min-1, P < 0.05). The fractional contribution of basal, regional FFA release to total FFA flux was not significantly different between men and women. In contrast, oleate release by upper-body subcutaneous adipose tissue was significantly greater (30 +/- 5 vs 8 +/- 3 mumol/min, respectively, P < 0.01) in men than in women during the meal nadir of FFA flux, whereas splanchnic oleate release was a greater percentage (39 +/- 7% vs 20 +/- 3%, respectively, P < 0.05) of nadir oleate Ra in women than in men. Thus, normal weight men and women differ significantly in the postprandial regulation of adipose tissue lipolysis in that men's upper-body subcutaneous adipose tissue is more resistant to the antilipolytic effects of meal ingestion. Differential regulation of regional adipose tissue lipolysis could contribute to the gender based differences in body fat distribution.
Authors: S W Coppack; R M Fisher; G F Gibbons; S M Humphreys; M J McDonough; J L Potts; K N Frayn Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 1990-10 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: P Mårin; B Andersson; M Ottosson; L Olbe; B Chowdhury; H Kvist; G Holm; L Sjöström; P Björntorp Journal: Metabolism Date: 1992-11 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Jason M Ng; Koichiro Azuma; Carol Kelley; Richard Pencek; Zofia Radikova; Charles Laymon; Julie Price; Bret H Goodpaster; David E Kelley Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Søren Nielsen; ZengKui Guo; Jeanine B Albu; Samuel Klein; Peter C O'Brien; Michael D Jensen Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Jacquelyn A Hatch-Stein; Andrea Kelly; Samuel S Gidding; Babette S Zemel; Sheela N Magge Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: Tamara Tchkonia; Thomas Thomou; Yi Zhu; Iordanes Karagiannides; Charalabos Pothoulakis; Michael D Jensen; James L Kirkland Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 27.287