Roy J Shephard1, Nathan Johnson. 1. Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, royjshep@shaw.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review the responses of the liver to acute and chronic physical activity and to summarize relationships between physical activity and liver health. METHODS: A systematic search of HealthStar/Ovid from 1975 through June of 2013, supplemented by articles from other sources. RESULTS: 351 of 8,010 articles identified by HealthStar/Ovid were supplemented by 92 other papers; after focussing, the review was reduced to 435 citations. Prolonged acute exercise reduces hepatic blood flow, stimulating hepatic glycogenolysis, gluconeogenesis and synthesis of some proteins; however, lipid metabolism shows little change. Glutathione depletion suggests oxidative stress. Enzymes affecting carbohydrate metabolism are up-regulated, and lipogenic enzymes are down-regulated. The main triggers are humoral, but hepatic afferent nerves, cytokines, reactive oxygen species, and changes in hepatic blood flow may all play some role. Regular aerobic exercise training improves blood glucose control during exercise by increasing glycogen stores and up-regulating enzymes involved in gluconeogenesis and carbohydrate metabolism. Resistance to oxidant stress is generally increased by training. Lipogenic enzymes are down-regulated, and lipid metabolism is augmented. Modulations of insulin, insulin-like growth factor, glucagon and interleukin-6 may trigger the adaptive responses to training. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies show that regular exercise can reduce hepatic fat, but the effect on circulating aminotransferases is unclear and the modality and dose of physical activity optimizing health benefits need clarification. CONCLUSIONS: Regular moderate physical activity enhances liver health. Adverse functional changes can develop if habitual activity is inadequate, and extremely prolonged competitive exercise may also be harmful, particularly under harsh environmental conditions.
PURPOSE: To review the responses of the liver to acute and chronic physical activity and to summarize relationships between physical activity and liver health. METHODS: A systematic search of HealthStar/Ovid from 1975 through June of 2013, supplemented by articles from other sources. RESULTS: 351 of 8,010 articles identified by HealthStar/Ovid were supplemented by 92 other papers; after focussing, the review was reduced to 435 citations. Prolonged acute exercise reduces hepatic blood flow, stimulating hepatic glycogenolysis, gluconeogenesis and synthesis of some proteins; however, lipid metabolism shows little change. Glutathione depletion suggests oxidative stress. Enzymes affecting carbohydrate metabolism are up-regulated, and lipogenic enzymes are down-regulated. The main triggers are humoral, but hepatic afferent nerves, cytokines, reactive oxygen species, and changes in hepatic blood flow may all play some role. Regular aerobic exercise training improves blood glucose control during exercise by increasing glycogen stores and up-regulating enzymes involved in gluconeogenesis and carbohydrate metabolism. Resistance to oxidant stress is generally increased by training. Lipogenic enzymes are down-regulated, and lipid metabolism is augmented. Modulations of insulin, insulin-like growth factor, glucagon and interleukin-6 may trigger the adaptive responses to training. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies show that regular exercise can reduce hepatic fat, but the effect on circulating aminotransferases is unclear and the modality and dose of physical activity optimizing health benefits need clarification. CONCLUSIONS: Regular moderate physical activity enhances liver health. Adverse functional changes can develop if habitual activity is inadequate, and extremely prolonged competitive exercise may also be harmful, particularly under harsh environmental conditions.
Authors: F M Finucane; S J Sharp; L R Purslow; K Horton; J Horton; D B Savage; S Brage; H Besson; E De Lucia Rolfe; A Sleigh; H J Martin; A Aihie Sayer; C Cooper; U Ekelund; S J Griffin; N J Wareham Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: G O'Donovan; E L Thomas; J P McCarthy; J Fitzpatrick; G Durighel; S Mehta; S X Morin; A P Goldstone; J D Bell Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Brandon S Klinedinst; Nathan F Meier; Brittany Larsen; Yueying Wang; Shan Yu; Jonathan P Mochel; Scott Le; Tovah Wolf; Amy Pollpeter; Colleen Pappas; Qian Wang; Karin Allenspach; Li Wang; Daniel Russell; David A Bennett; Auriel A Willette Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Kaleen M Lavin; Paul M Coen; Liliana C Baptista; Margaret B Bell; Devin Drummer; Sara A Harper; Manoel E Lixandrão; Jeremy S McAdam; Samia M O'Bryan; Sofhia Ramos; Lisa M Roberts; Rick B Vega; Bret H Goodpaster; Marcas M Bamman; Thomas W Buford Journal: Compr Physiol Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 8.915
Authors: Frank M Schmidt; Julia Weschenfelder; Christian Sander; Juliane Minkwitz; Julia Thormann; Tobias Chittka; Roland Mergl; Kenneth C Kirkby; Mathias Faßhauer; Michael Stumvoll; Lesca M Holdt; Daniel Teupser; Ulrich Hegerl; Hubertus Himmerich Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bram Brouwers; Matthijs K C Hesselink; Patrick Schrauwen; Vera B Schrauwen-Hinderling Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Christine Bekos; Matthias Zimmermann; Lukas Unger; Stefan Janik; Philipp Hacker; Andreas Mitterbauer; Michael Koller; Robert Fritz; Christian Gäbler; Mario Kessler; Stefanie Nickl; Jessica Didcock; Patrick Altmann; Thomas Haider; Georg Roth; Walter Klepetko; Hendrik Jan Ankersmit; Bernhard Moser Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 4.379