Literature DB >> 7591892

Prognostic value of cervical size and pelvic lymph node status assessed by computed tomography for patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by radical radiation therapy.

T Toita1, M Nakano, M Higashi, K Sakumoto, K Kanazawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic impact of cervical size and pelvic lymph node status assessed by computed tomography (CT) in uterine cervical carcinoma treated with irradiation alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IIB and IIIB uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with a combination of external and high dose-rate intracavitary irradiation were entered into analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox regression model were performed to determine statistical significance of some tumor-related factors.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in pelvic control rate (PC), distant metastases-free rate (DMF), cause-specific disease-free survival rate (CSDFS) among subgroups with cervix < 60 mm in diameter. However, PC (p = 0.023), DMF (p = 0.000025), and CSDFS (p = 0.0023) were significantly lower for patients with cervix > or = 60 mm than < 60 mm. The 5-year CSDFS was 77.5% for < 60 mm, and 28.6% for > or = 60 mm. Pelvic node status assessed by CT scans had significant prognostic impact on outcome. the 5-year CSDFS rate was 84.9% for patients with no enlarged nodes, and 58.9% for those with enlarged nodes greater than 1 cm in minimum diameter (p = 0.023). Whereas PC was not significantly affected, the DMF was strongly correlated with nodal status (p = 0.00027). Pelvic node status was taken as an independent predictor for DMF (p = 0.019) on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Although cervical size assessed by CT had limited prognostic value, pelvic node status assessed by CT is the significant prognostic factor for patients with uterine cervical carcinoma treated with radical irradiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7591892     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00204-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

1.  Definitive radiation therapy for invasive carcinoma of the vagina: impact of high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy.

Authors:  Tetsuo Nonaka; Yuko Nakayama; Nobutaka Mizoguchi; Ryo Onose; Hisamori Kato; Hiroki Nakayama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  A Brief Overview of Oncogenes and Signal Transduction Pathways in Gynecological Cancer.

Authors:  Emmanuel N Kontomanolis; Antonios Koutras; Zacharias Fasoulakis; Athanasios Syllaios; Michail Diakosavvas; Kyveli Angelou; Panagiotis Symeonidis; Athina A Samara; Vasilios Pergialiotis; Nikolaos Garmpis; Dimitrios Schizas; Athanasios Pagkalos; Athanasios Chionis; Georgios Daskalakis; Thomas Ntounis
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2022-03-03

3.  Bromocriptine therapy for the treatment of invasive prolactinoma: the single institute experience.

Authors:  Kyung Rae Cho; Kyung-Il Jo; Hyung Jin Shin
Journal:  Brain Tumor Res Treat       Date:  2013-10-31

4.  The impact of irradiation dose on the computed tomography radiographic response of metastatic nodes and clinical outcomes in cervix cancer in a low-resource setting.

Authors:  Matthew Ryan McKeever; Lindsay Hwang; Jennifer Barclay; Yin Xi; April Bailey; Kevin Albuquerque
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

5.  Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with FIGO II to III Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinoma Under Radical Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 2018 FIGO Staging.

Authors:  Lele Zang; Qin Chen; Xiaozhen Zhang; Xiaohong Zhong; Jian Chen; Yi Fang; An Lin; Min Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study.

Authors:  Xiaolin Chen; Hui Duan; Ping Liu; Lihong Lin; Yan Ni; Donglin Li; Encheng Dai; Xuemei Zhan; Pengfei Li; Zhifeng Huo; Xiaonong Bin; Jinghe Lang; Chunlin Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-01

7.  The value of prognostic factors for uterine cervical cancer patients treated with irradiation alone.

Authors:  Rūta Grigiene; Konstantinas P Valuckas; Eduardas Aleknavicius; Juozas Kurtinaitis; Simona R Letautiene
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  External beam boost irradiation for clinically positive pelvic nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Takuro Ariga; Takafumi Toita; Goro Kasuya; Yutaka Nagai; Morihiko Inamine; Wataru Kudaka; Yasumasa Kakinohana; Youichi Aoki; Sadayuki Murayama
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.724

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.