Literature DB >> 7590477

Surveillance for recurrent endometrial carcinoma: development of a follow-up scheme.

J M Reddoch1, T W Burke, M Morris, C Tornos, C Levenback, D M Gershenson.   

Abstract

We examined the method of diagnosis for a group of women who developed recurrent endometrial carcinoma after being rendered clinically disease-free by primary therapy. We then used this information to develop a follow-up protocol that maximizes the chances for detecting recurrence while minimizing surveillance costs. In brief, we evaluated all women with clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma who were treated with curative intent during a 7-year period. Medical records were examined to identify patients who had tumor recurrence diagnosed during follow-up in our clinic. Clinical presentation, time to diagnosis, method of diagnosis, and subsequent outcome were analyzed. This information was used to design a surveillance protocol for further clinical testing. Ninety-six percent of 412 women treated between 1985 and 1992 were clinically disease-free after primary surgery with or without adjuvant treatment. Median follow-up is 64 months. Overall, 44 patients (11%) developed recurrent cancer after a median interval of 14.8 months. Complete follow-up data were available for the 39 patients who had their recurrence diagnosed in our clinic. The cumulative percentages of diagnosed recurrences were 51, 82, and 95% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Sixteen women (41%) had symptoms that led to the identification of recurrent disease. Recurrences in the 23 asymptomatic women (59%) were diagnosed by physical examination in 13, chest radiograph in 1, serum CA-125 level in 6, vaginal cytology in 1, and computed tomography in 2. Only 1 patient with a grade 1 adenocarcinoma had treatment failure. At the time of analysis, 30 patients with recurrent cancer had died of disease, 6 were alive with disease, and 3 were free of disease. A surveillance scheme consisting of an examination, vaginal cytology, and serum CA-125, combined with immediate evaluation of symptomatic women, could be expected to identify 95% of recurrences. Such an approach, performed at 6- to 12-month intervals for 3 years, could be limited to patients with grade 2-3 adenocarcinomas or variant cell types. However, given the high failure rate of salvage therapy, the prompt detection of recurrence may not convey a survival advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7590477     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1995.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

1.  Patterns and utility of routine surveillance in high grade endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jessica Hunn; Meaghan E Tenney; Ana I Tergas; Erin A Bishop; Kathleen Moore; William Watkin; Carolyn Kirschner; Jean Hurteau; Gustavo C Rodriguez; Ernst Lengyel; Nita K Lee; S Diane Yamada
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Serum CA125 predicts extrauterine disease and survival in uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Gloria S Huang; Lydia G Chiu; Juliana S Gebb; Marc J Gunter; Paniti Sukumvanich; Gary L Goldberg; Mark H Einstein
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Endometrial carcinoma: better prognosis for asymptomatic recurrences than for symptomatic cases found by routine follow-up.

Authors:  Yutaka Ueda; Takayuki Enomoto; Tomomi Egawa-Takata; Takashi Miyatake; Kiyoshi Yoshino; Masami Fujita; Shinya Matsuzaki; Takuhei Yokoyama; Yukari Miyoshi; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Promoter hypomethylation of EpCAM-regulated bone morphogenetic protein gene family in recurrent endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ya-Ting Hsu; Fei Gu; Yi-Wen Huang; Joseph Liu; Jianhua Ruan; Rui-Lan Huang; Chiou-Miin Wang; Chun-Liang Chen; Rohit R Jadhav; Hung-Cheng Lai; David G Mutch; Paul J Goodfellow; Ian M Thompson; Nameer B Kirma; Tim Hui-Ming Huang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  How Do We Follow Up Patients With Endometrial Cancer?

Authors:  Mette Moustgaard Jeppesen; Ole Mogensen; Dorte G Hansen; Stinne H Bergholdt; Pernille T Jensen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Gynaecological cancer follow-up: national survey of current practice in the UK.

Authors:  Simon Leeson; Nick Stuart; Yvonne Sylvestre; Liz Hall; Rhiannon Whitaker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Risk factors for recurrence amongst high intermediate risk patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Agnes Y Bahng; Christina Chu; Paul Wileyto; Stephen Rubin; Lilie L Lin
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  Cancer of the endometrium: current aspects of diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Karsten Münstedt; Phillip Grant; Joachim Woenckhaus; Gabriele Roth; Hans-Rudolf Tinneberg
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  The prognostic impact of pulmonary metastasectomy in recurrent gynecologic cancers: a retrospective single-institution study.

Authors:  Manabu Adachi; Mika Mizuno; Hiroko Mitsui; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Shiro Suzuki; Ryuichiro Sekiya; Fumi Utsumi; Kiyosumi Shibata; Tetsuo Taniguchi; Koji Kawaguchi; Kohei Yokoi; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.131

Review 10.  Pharmacological Treatment of Advanced, Persistent or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer: State of the Art and Perspectives of Clinical Research for the Special Issue "Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer".

Authors:  Angiolo Gadducci; Stefania Cosio
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.