Literature DB >> 20425132

Endometrial carcinoma: better prognosis for asymptomatic recurrences than for symptomatic cases found by routine follow-up.

Yutaka Ueda1, Takayuki Enomoto, Tomomi Egawa-Takata, Takashi Miyatake, Kiyoshi Yoshino, Masami Fujita, Shinya Matsuzaki, Takuhei Yokoyama, Yukari Miyoshi, Tadashi Kimura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine if there is a prognostic value for the presence of symptoms at the time of recurrence detection in surgically resected endometrial carcinoma patients.
METHODS: During the study period of 2000-2006, complete surgical removal of endometrial carcinoma was achieved in 271 stage I-IV endometrial cancer cases at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan. A subsequent recurrence was detected in 29 (11%) of these cases. Patient characteristics and clinicopathological features were retrospectively reviewed utilizing their clinical records.
RESULTS: Among the 29 cases with a recurrence, 13 (45%) had symptoms, whereas in the other 16 cases (55%) the recurrent disease was found only during routine follow-up procedures. Although the time to detection of recurrence was similar for both asymptomatic and symptomatic cases, progression-free survival after detection in the 16 asymptomatic patients was significantly longer than for the 13 symptomatic patients (P = 0.017); this was found to be especially true in those who underwent chemotherapy as their adjuvant therapy (P = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: A better prognosis after recurrence was demonstrated in cases that were asymptomatic at the time of recurrence detection than in those in which the tumor was symptomatic. This finding implies that, after the initial surgical resection, intensive follow-up intervention looking for asymptomatic recurrences may significantly improve the prognosis of endometrial carcinoma patients. A further in-depth prospective study is required to establish a standard strategy of follow-up care for endometrial cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20425132     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-010-0080-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  18 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of routine follow-up after curative treatment for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  O O Agboola; E Grunfeld; D Coyle; G A Perry
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laurie Elit; Anthony W Fyles; Michaela C Devries; Thomas K Oliver; Michael Fung-Kee-Fung
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Recurrence of endometrial carcinoma and the value of routine follow up.

Authors:  H B Salvesen; L A Akslen; T Iversen; O E Iversen
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-11

4.  An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.

Authors:  A Gadducci; S Cosio; A Fanucchi; R Cristofani; A R Genazzani
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Value and cost evaluation of routine follow-up for patients with clinical stage I/II endometrial cancer.

Authors:  P Morice; C Levy-Piedbois; S Ajaj; P Pautier; C Haie-Meder; C Lhomme; P Duvillard; D Castaigne
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  A critical evaluation of follow-up of women treated for endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  A F Gordon; P Owen; P F Chien; I D Duncan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Surveillance for recurrent endometrial carcinoma: development of a follow-up scheme.

Authors:  J M Reddoch; T W Burke; M Morris; C Tornos; C Levenback; D M Gershenson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  A prospective trail comparing hysterectomy, hysterectomy plus vaginal radium, and uterine radium plus hysterectomy in stage I endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  M S Piver; R Yazigi; L Blumenson; Y Tsukada
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Postsurgical surveillance of patients with FIGO stage I/II endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  A Berchuck; C Anspach; A C Evans; J T Soper; G C Rodriguez; R Dodge; S Robboy; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Is there any value in the long term follow up of women treated for endometrial cancer?

Authors:  P Owen; I D Duncan
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-07
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  How Do We Follow Up Patients With Endometrial Cancer?

Authors:  Mette Moustgaard Jeppesen; Ole Mogensen; Dorte G Hansen; Stinne H Bergholdt; Pernille T Jensen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Reassessment of intensive surveillance practices adopted for endometrial cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kazuto Nakamura; Yoshikazu Kitahara; Soichi Yamashita; Keiko Kigure; Ikuro Ito; Toshio Nishimura; Anri Azuma; Tatsuya Kanuma
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Trial of Optimal Personalised Care After Treatment for Gynaecological cancer (TOPCAT-G): a study protocol for a randomised feasibility trial.

Authors:  Kirstie Pye; Nicola Totton; Nicholas Stuart; Rhiannon Whitaker; Val Morrison; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Seow Tien Yeo; Laura J Timmis; Caryl Butterworth; Liz Hall; Tekendra Rai; Zoe Hoare; Richard D Neal; Clare Wilkinson; Simon Leeson
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-11-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.