Literature DB >> 7589671

Ovarian volume: a novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction.

C H Syrop1, A Willhoite, B J Van Voorhis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential of ovarian volume as a predictor of assisted reproduction outcomes.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: University-based assisted reproduction program. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-eight women initiating their first cycle of assisted reproduction.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound ovarian measurements were compared with subsequent ovulation induction parameters (peak E2, numbers of oocytes, and embryos) and cycle outcome (cancellation and pregnancy). RESULT: Total ovarian volume and volume of the smallest ovary were significant variables predicting peak E2 and numbers of oocytes and embryos. Total ovarian volume was a predictor of cycle cancellation and volume of the smallest ovary a predictor of clinical pregnancy. Large ovarian volumes are associated with good assisted reproductive technology outcomes whereas small ovarian volumes are associated with poor outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Beyond maternal age, total ovarian volume, and volume of the smallest ovary are significant predictors of the success of assisted reproductive techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7589671     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57979-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  21 in total

1.  A prospective novel method of determining ovarian size during in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  John L Frattarelli; Andrew J Levi; Bradley T Miller
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Mean ovarian diameter (MOD) as a predictor of poor ovarian response.

Authors:  Iavor K Vladimirov; Desislava M Tacheva; Krassimir B Kalinov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  High FSH:LH ratio and low LH levels in basal cycle day 3: impact on follicular development and IVF outcome.

Authors:  G Barroso; S Oehninger; A Monzó; P Kolm; W E Gibbons; S J Muasher
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The use of inversion mode and 3D manual segmentation in volume measurement of fetal fluid-filled structures: comparison with Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL).

Authors:  J P Kusanovic; J K Nien; L F Gonçalves; J Espinoza; W Lee; M Balasubramaniam; E Soto; O Erez; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Antral follicle assessment as a tool for predicting outcome in IVF--is it a better predictor than age and FSH?

Authors:  R Nahum; J L Shifren; Y Chang; L Leykin; K Isaacson; T L Toth
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Predicting pregnancy in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization with basal serum follicle stimulating hormone levels between 10.0 and 11.9 IU/L.

Authors:  Dan Levin; Sunny H Jun; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-03-01

7.  The Gynecologist Has a Unique Role in Providing Oncofertility Care to Young Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Francesca E Duncan; Jennifer K Jozefik; Alison M Kim; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  US Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-01-01

8.  The clinical analysis of poor ovarian response in in-vitro-fertilization embryo-transfer among Chinese couples.

Authors:  X M Zhen; J Qiao; R Li; L N Wang; P Liu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  The significance of antral follicle size prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian response in a multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Qiaohong Lai; Cai Chen; Zhijun Zhang; Shu Zhang; Qilin Yu; Ping Yang; Jun Hu; Cong-Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-01-15

10.  Comparison of basal and clomiphene citrate induced FSH and inhibin B, ovarian volume and antral follicle counts as ovarian reserve tests and predictors of poor ovarian response in IVF.

Authors:  Mehmet Erdem; Ahmet Erdem; Rifat Gursoy; Kutay Biberoglu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.