Literature DB >> 7588903

'White-coat' hypertension in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension: evaluation of prevalence by ambulatory monitoring and impact on cost of health care.

S D Pierdomenico1, A Mezzetti, D Lapenna, M D Guglielmi, M Mancini, L Salvatore, T Antidormi, F Costantini, F Cuccurullo.   

Abstract

To evaluate the prevalence of 'white-coat' hypertension in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, 255 subjects (131 males and 124 females) underwent 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Patients with 24-h systolic and diastolic blood pressure < 135/85 mmHg were classified as white-coat hypertensives and the remaining as sustained hypertensives. On the assumption that white-coat hypertensives may not need to take antihypertensive medication, we evaluated the impact on cost of health care of two strategies based essentially on treating all patients according to casual blood pressure, or ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, followed by drug treatment in sustained hypertensives only. Of the 255 hypertensives studied, 54 (21%), confidence interval 16%, 26%, were classified as white-coat hypertensives. The age, sex-ratio and body mass index did not differ between the white-coat and the sustained hypertensive subjects. The strategy of monitoring all patients and of treating only the sustained hypertensives resulted in a substantial coat saving, which was calculated to be about 110,000 U.S.A. dollars over a period of 6 years. In conclusion, white-coat hypertensives are frequent among patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, and they do not differ from sustained hypertensives as regards demographic data. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, when used to decide whether or not to treat pharmacologically, increases the cost-effectiveness of treatment for hypertension and reduces the cost of health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7588903     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  15 in total

1.  Persistence with treatment for hypertension in actual practice.

Authors:  J J Caro; M Salas; J L Speckman; G Raggio; J D Jackson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-01-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Effect of initial drug choice on persistence with antihypertensive therapy: the importance of actual practice data.

Authors:  J J Caro; J L Speckman; M Salas; G Raggio; J D Jackson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-01-12       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Frequency and related factors of masked hypertension at a worksite in Korea.

Authors:  Sang-Kyu Kim; Jun-Ho Bae; Dung-Young Nah; Dong-Wook Lee; Tae-Yoon Hwang; Kyeong-Soo Lee
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2011-05

Review 4.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Complementary Strategy for Hypertension Diagnosis and Management in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Marwah Abdalla
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.213

5.  [Effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood pressure in white coat hypertension diagnosis. Rationale and design].

Authors:  J Bayó Llibre; C Roca Saumell; A Dalfó Baqué; F X Cos Claramunt; M M Martín Baranera; A Botey Puig
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 6.  Economics of antihypertensive therapy in the elderly.

Authors:  E C Dunn; R E Small
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Prevalence and predictors of white-coat response in patients with treated hypertension.

Authors:  M B MacDonald; G P Laing; M P Wilson; T W Wilson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-08-10       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Preventing misdiagnosis of ambulatory hypertension: algorithm using office and home blood pressures.

Authors:  Daichi Shimbo; Sujith Kuruvilla; Donald Haas; Thomas G Pickering; Joseph E Schwartz; William Gerin
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Is ambulatory blood pressure monitoring cost-effective in the routine surveillance of treated hypertensive patients in primary care?

Authors:  Paula Lorgelly; Ilias Siatis; Andrew Brooks; Barbara Slinn; Michael W Millar-Craig; Richard Donnelly; Gillian Manning
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 10.  Cost-effectiveness of secondary screening modalities for hypertension.

Authors:  Y Claire Wang; Alisa M Koval; Miyabi Nakamura; Jonathan D Newman; Joseph E Schwartz; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.