Literature DB >> 7586406

Effect of the implantable left ventricular assist device on neuroendocrine activation in heart failure.

K B James1, P M McCarthy, J D Thomas, R Vargo, R E Hobbs, S Sapp, E Bravo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate left ventricular assist device has been successfully used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Because many patients exhibit marked clinical improvement in their heart failure after HeartMate implantation, we studied the physiological effect of this device on the neurohormonal axis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 13 patients awaiting transplant (mean cardiac index, 1.7 +/- 0.3 L.min-1.m-2) who underwent HeartMate implantation, venous atrial natriuretic peptide, epinephrine, norepinephrine, plasma renin activity, angiotensin, and arginine vasopressin were measured immediately before insertion and at explant/transplantation. Mean time to explant was 86 +/- 40 days. All patients were taken off inotropic medications within 1 month. Mean cardiac index on support before explant was 3.1 +/- 0.9 L.min-1.m-2. Plasma renin activity decreased from 57 +/- 56 ng.mL-1.h-1 at baseline (before insertion) to 3 +/- 3 ng.mL-1.h-1 at explant (mean percent change, 92%; P < .001). Angiotensin II level decreased from 237 +/- 398 U/L at baseline to 14 +/- 14 U/L at explant (mean percent change, 73%; P < .001). Plasma epinephrine level fell from 6800 +/- 1323 pg/mL at baseline to 46 +/- 46 pg/mL at explant (mean percent change, 86%; P < .001). Norepinephrine level decreased from 2953 +/- 1457 pg/mL at baseline to 518 +/- 290 pg/mL at explant (mean percent change, 79%; P < .001). Atrial natriuretic peptide fell from baseline values of 227 +/- 196 to 168 +/- 40 pg/mL at explant (mean percent change, -49%; P = 519); and arginine vasopressin level decreased from 6 +/- 6 pg/mL at baseline to 0.8 +/- 0.5 pg/mL (mean percent change, 69%; P = .002).
CONCLUSIONS: We provide data supporting that the neurohormonal axis markedly improves after HeartMate implantation, providing biochemical confirmation of the improvement in hemodynamic status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7586406     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.9.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  22 in total

Review 1.  Novel Left Ventricular Assist System: an electrocardiogram-synchronized LVAS that avoids cardiac cannulation.

Authors:  Domingo Liotta
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Reverse cardiac remodeling enabled by mechanical unloading of the left ventricle.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Malliaras; John V Terrovitis; Stavros G Drakos; John N Nanas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Bridge to recovery: understanding the disconnect between clinical and biological outcomes.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Ventricular assist devices: destination therapy or just another stop on the road?

Authors:  Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2004 Apr-May

5.  Reduced effects of BAY K 8644 on L-type Ca2+ current in failing human cardiac myocytes are related to abnormal adrenergic regulation.

Authors:  Xiongwen Chen; Xiaoying Zhang; David M Harris; Valentino Piacentino; Remus M Berretta; Kenneth B Margulies; Steven R Houser
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Left ventricular remodeling and myocardial recovery on mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Marc A Simon; Brian A Primack; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Robert L Kormos; Christian Bermudez; Yoshiya Toyoda; Hemal Shah; John Gorcsan; Dennis M McNamara
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Heart failure in remission for more than 13 years after removal of a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Ana Maria Segura; Lamia Dris; Edward K Massin; Fred J Clubb; L Maximilian Buja; O H Frazier; Heinrich Taegtmeyer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-08-01

8.  Reversal of impaired myocardial beta-adrenergic receptor signaling by continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Shahab A Akhter; Karen M D'Souza; Ricky Malhotra; Michelle L Staron; Tracy B Valeroso; Savitri E Fedson; Allen S Anderson; Jai Raman; Valluvan Jeevanandam
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Right ventricular dysfunction during intensive pharmacologic unloading persists after mechanical unloading.

Authors:  Maryse Palardy; Anju Nohria; Jose Rivero; Neal Lakdawala; Patricia Campbell; Mahoto Kato; Leslie M Griffin; Colleen M Smith; Gregory S Couper; Lynne W Stevenson; Michael M Givertz
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 10.  Left ventricular assist device unloading effects on myocardial structure and function: current status of the field and call for action.

Authors:  Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Craig H Selzman; Divya Ratan Verma; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li; Josef Stehlik
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.