Literature DB >> 7586299

Magnetic resonance angiography of anomalous coronary arteries. A new gold standard for delineating the proximal course?

J C Post1, A C van Rossum, J G Bronzwaer, C C de Cock, M B Hofman, J Valk, C A Visser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of anomalously originating coronary arteries depends on their proximal course. Diagnosis of this course by conventional x-ray coronary angiography alone may be equivocal. We postulated that with fast magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, accurate detection of anomalous coronary arteries and unambiguous delineation of their proximal course is feasible. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In a selected group of 38 patients, 19 of them having an anomalously originating coronary artery, a fast MR angiographic technique was used to study the proximal coronary anatomy. Blinded analysis of randomly ordered MR studies was performed independently by two observers. Both origin and proximal course of the coronary arteries were defined. Two cardiologists reviewed all x-ray coronary angiograms. After the separate analyses, a final consensus result was defined for each patient. In 37 patients, successful MR coronary angiography could be performed. Interobserver agreement for determining both origin and proximal course was 100%. An x-ray coronary angiogram was available in 36 patients. In 3 patients (all with an anomalous left main coronary artery originating from the right aortic sinus), there was disagreement about the proximal course between the results of MR and x-ray coronary angiography. Review of these cases demonstrated that MR angiography had unambiguously visualized the proximal coronary artery course, whereas the results of x-ray angiography had been equivocal. Thus, sensitivity and specificity for detecting anomalous coronary arteries and delineating their proximal course were 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that fast MR angiography is highly accurate in determining the origin and delineating the proximal course of anomalous coronary arteries, even in those cases in which x-ray coronary angiographic diagnosis is difficult or even erroneous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7586299     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.11.3163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  46 in total

1.  Diagnosis and management of anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the left coronary sinus.

Authors:  M A Bekedam; H W Vliegen; J Doornbos; J W Jukema; A de Roos; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-06

2.  Imaging of an aberrant right coronary artery with retrospective respiratory-gated 3D-MR angiography.

Authors:  O M Kalinkin; P K Woodard; P A Ludbrook; F R Gutierrez
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G J Heatlie; K Pointon
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Anomalous origination of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus.

Authors:  Joanna C E Lim; Andy Beale; Steve Ramcharitar
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries: imaging with contrast-enhanced, multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Rainer Schmitt; Steffen Froehner; Juergen Brunn; Matthias Wagner; Horst Brunner; Oleg Cherevatyy; Frank Gietzen; Georgios Christopoulos; Sebastian Kerber; Franz Fellner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  [Cardiovascular MRT--replacement of diagnostic invasive coronary angiography?].

Authors:  S Kelle; E Nagel; E Fleck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Coronary arterial malformation depicted at multi-slice CT angiography.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Taiji Nishiharu; Joji Urata; Masaki Ino; Koichi Nakao; Kazuo Awai; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Three-dimensional breathhold magnetization-prepared TrueFISP: a pilot study for magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Richard M McCarthy; Vibhas S Deshpande; Nirat Beohar; Sheridan N Meyers; Steven M Shea; Jordin D Green; Xin Liu; Xiaoming Bi; F Scott Pereles; John Paul Finn; Charles J Davidson; James C Carr; Debiao Li
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.