Literature DB >> 7584762

Screening and empiric treatment for syphilis in an inner-city emergency department.

A A Ernst1, T A Farley, D H Martin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine targeted screening and empiric treatment for syphilis in an urban ED.
METHODS: Screening of emergency patients during previously arranged shifts from July 1991 through January 1992 in a university-affiliated, inner-city ED. Emergency patients who perceived that they had high-risk factors for syphilis (i.e., cocaine or heroin use or sexual contact with a user of these substances) were compared with emergency patients denying high risk. All presumed high-risk patients and alternate patients in the group who denied high risk (control group) were screened in the ED with the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test. Empiric antibiotic treatment was initiated if the patient was RPR-positive and gave no previous history of syphilis. In addition, serum was submitted to the state laboratory for VDRL and microhemagglutination-Treponema pallidum (MHA-TP) testing. Blinded serologic testing for HIV antibody was performed later on frozen serum.
RESULTS: Of 806 patients presenting to the ED, 276 (34%) admitted to high-risk behavior. Of 373 patients tested by RPR in the ED (216 high-risk and 157 control patients), no significant difference was found between the high-risk and the control patients in untreated syphilis [8 (4%) vs 4 (3%)] or positive MHA-TP [47 (22%) vs 25 (16%)]. In the high-risk group, the women were more likely than the men to be MHA-TP-positive (OR = 2.58, 95% CI 1.12-7.98, p = 0.04). Among the women, the MHA-TP was more often positive for the high-risk than for the control patients (34% vs 15%, OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.12-4.67, p = 0.023). For the high-risk group, seven (3%) new cases of syphilis were managed empirically, vs three (2%) new cases for the control group. HIV antibodies were detected in 16 of 212 (8%) high-risk patients and five of 155 (3%) control subjects (p = 0.13).
CONCLUSION: This inner-city ED population has a high frequency of positive syphilis and HIV serologies, regardless of acknowledged drug use risk factors. Therefore, in areas reporting high syphilis infection rates, consideration should be given to offering screening for syphilis to all emergency patients, along with establishment of adequate counseling and follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7584762     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03269.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  5 in total

Review 1.  Syphilis: review with emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, and some biologic features.

Authors:  A E Singh; B Romanowski
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Adequacy of testing, empiric treatment, and referral for adult male emergency department patients with possible chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea urethritis.

Authors:  R C Merchant; D M Depalo; M D Stein; J D Rich
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.359

3.  A Model for Syphilis Screening in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Justin A Yax; Joshua D Niforatos; Daniel L Summers; Margaret H Bigach; Christine Schmotzer; Barbara M Gripshover; Ann Avery
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The efficacy and value of emergency medicine: a supportive literature review.

Authors:  C James Holliman; Terrence M Mulligan; Robert E Suter; Peter Cameron; Lee Wallis; Philip D Anderson; Kathleen Clem
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-22

5.  Opt-Out, Routine Emergency Department Syphilis Screening as a Novel Intervention in At-Risk Populations.

Authors:  Kimberly A Stanford; Aniruddha Hazra; Eleanor Friedman; Samantha Devlin; Nolan Winkler; Jessica P Ridgway; John Schneider
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.868

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.