Literature DB >> 33009277

Opt-Out, Routine Emergency Department Syphilis Screening as a Novel Intervention in At-Risk Populations.

Kimberly A Stanford1, Aniruddha Hazra2, Eleanor Friedman2, Samantha Devlin2, Nolan Winkler2, Jessica P Ridgway2, John Schneider2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With syphilis rates rising rapidly in the United States, novel means of reaching high-risk populations for screening and treatment are needed. Building on successful models for emergency department (ED) HIV screening, a routine opt-out syphilis screening program was implemented in a large, urban, tertiary care hospital ED in May 2019. This study aims to assess the prevalence of syphilis in this population and to evaluate the routine, opt-out syphilis screening model.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients screened for syphilis in the ED from June to December 2019. Demographic information, HIV status, chief complaint, and follow-up visits were examined.
RESULTS: During the study period, 9198 people aged 18 to 64 years were screened for syphilis. Of these, 97 (1.1%) had presumed active syphilis infection (PAI), 354 (3.8%) were presumed not to have active syphilis, and 8747 (95.1%) were negative for infection. Patients with PAI were more likely to be male (67%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-5.3; P < 0.001), although the percentage of women was considerably higher than the nationally reported rate, and most were non-Hispanic Black (93.8%). Among patients with PAI, 23 (23.7%) were HIV positive. Only 18.6% of patients with PAI presented with complaints related to sexually transmitted infections.
CONCLUSIONS: Syphilis rates in this community are very high, and many infections were found in populations traditionally considered at lower risk by demographic or presenting complaint, indicating that universal screening is needed. Routine ED syphilis screening in high-prevalence communities will be critical to addressing the syphilis epidemic.
Copyright © 2020 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33009277      PMCID: PMC8012396          DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   3.868


  23 in total

1.  Understanding why patients of low socioeconomic status prefer hospitals over ambulatory care.

Authors:  Shreya Kangovi; Frances K Barg; Tamala Carter; Judith A Long; Richard Shannon; David Grande
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Unsuspected gonorrhea and chlamydia in patients of an urban adult emergency department: a critical population for STD control intervention.

Authors:  S D Mehta; R E Rothman; G D Kelen; T C Quinn; J M Zenilman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Barriers to Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing of HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex With Men Engaged in HIV Primary Care.

Authors:  Lindley A Barbee; Shireesha Dhanireddy; Susana A Tat; Jeanne M Marrazzo
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescent and Caregiver Acceptability of Universally Offered Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Screening in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Jennifer L Reed; Brittany E Punches; Regina G Taylor; Maurizio Macaluso; Evaline A Alessandrini; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  National study of barriers to timely primary care and emergency department utilization among Medicaid beneficiaries.

Authors:  Paul T Cheung; Jennifer L Wiler; Robert A Lowe; Adit A Ginde
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in emergency departments: screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Supriya D Mehta
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Routine opt-out rapid HIV screening and detection of HIV infection in emergency department patients.

Authors:  Jason S Haukoos; Emily Hopkins; Amy A Conroy; Morgan Silverman; Richard L Byyny; Sheri Eisert; Mark W Thrun; Michael L Wilson; Angela B Hutchinson; Jessica Forsyth; Steven C Johnson; James D Heffelfinger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Chlamydia and gonorrhea screening in United States emergency departments.

Authors:  Wiley D Jenkins; Whitney Zahnd; Regina Kovach; Patricia Kissinger
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.484

9.  A field evaluation of a rapid dual immunoassay for human immunodeficiency virus and syphilis antibodies, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Authors:  Keenan Withers; Clare Bristow; Minh Nguyen; Chrysovalantis Stafylis; Le M Giang; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.359

10.  Universal Screening for Sexually Transmitted Infections among Asymptomatic Adolescents in an Urban Emergency Department: High Acceptance but Low Prevalence of Infection.

Authors:  Monika K Goyal; Stephen J Teach; Gia M Badolato; Maria Trent; James M Chamberlain
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lifetime prevalence of syphilis infection among predominantly Black sexual and gender minorities living with HIV in Atlanta, Georgia: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  John Mark Wiginton; Lisa A Eaton; Jolaade Kalinowski; Ryan J Watson; Seth C Kalichman
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.732

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.