Literature DB >> 7584257

The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory.

M A McDaniel1, G O Einstein.   

Abstract

Both retrospective cued-memory tasks and event-based prospective memory tasks require that cue and target information be associated, and that aspects of that association be reinstated for successful remembering. These functional similarities between retrospective memory and prospective memory were the bases for the hypothesis that the familiarity and the distinctiveness of the target event (cue) would influence prospective memory performance. Experiment 1, focusing on target familiarity, found a nominal advantage in prospective memory with unfamiliar target events. Experiment 2 showed a significant benefit for unfamiliar target events, as well as for target events that were distinctive relative to the local context. Additionally, prospective memory performance did not reliably correlate with explicit retrospective memory tasks (recall and recognition), but did correlate with an indirect retrospective memory task (word fragment completion). This pattern suggests and helps specify the general view that prospective memory processes may be similar to those involved in both direct and indirect tests of retrospective memory.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7584257     DOI: 10.1080/09658219308258223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  29 in total

1.  The activation of unrelated and canceled intentions.

Authors:  R L Marsh; J L Hicks; E S Bryan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

2.  Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: a new approach and age-related effects.

Authors:  M Kliegel; M A McDaniel; G O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

3.  Investigating the output monitoring component of event-based prospective memory performance.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Thomas W Hancock; Kirk Munsayac
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

4.  The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Thomas W Hancock; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

5.  Realizing complex delayed intentions in young and old adults: the role of planning aids.

Authors:  Matthias Kliegel; Mike Martin; Mark A McDaniel; Glles O Einstein; Caroline Moor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

6.  Memory for intention-related material presented in a to-be-ignored channel.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Gabriel I Cook; J Thadeus Meeks; Arlo Clark-Foos; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

7.  Learning is impaired by activated intentions.

Authors:  Gabriel I Cook; Richard L Marsh; Arlo Clark-Foos; J Thadeus Meeks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

8.  Improving the reliability of event-based laboratory tests of prospective memory.

Authors:  William L Kelemen; W Bailey Weinberg; Hannah S Alford; Emily K Mulvey; Kevin F Kaeochinda
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

9.  How do we process event-based and time-based intentions in the brain? an fMRI study of prospective memory in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Julie Gonneaud; Géraldine Rauchs; Mathilde Groussard; Brigitte Landeau; Florence Mézenge; Vincent de La Sayette; Francis Eustache; Béatrice Desgranges
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Implementation intentions and imagery: individual and combined effects on prospective memory among young adults.

Authors:  Craig McFarland; Elizabeth Glisky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.