Literature DB >> 18035620

Memory for intention-related material presented in a to-be-ignored channel.

Richard L Marsh1, Gabriel I Cook, J Thadeus Meeks, Arlo Clark-Foos, Jason L Hicks.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to investigate the fate of intention-related material processed in a to-be-ignored channel. Participants were given an intention to respond to cues in a visual-processing stream while simultaneously trying to ignore information being presented in an auditory stream. Subsequent to the ongoing activity, a surprise recognition test for information presented in the to-be-ignored auditory modality was administered. As compared with comparable neutral information, corrected recognition memory for intention-related material was significantly better, depending on the type of event-based prospective memory task. These results suggest that holding certain kinds of intentions can bias attentional processes in a manner consistent with a perceptual readiness for uptake of intention-related material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035620     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  Attention and performance.

Authors:  H Pashler; J C Johnston; E Ruthruff
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  On the psychology of drinking: being thirsty and perceptually ready.

Authors:  H Aarts; A Dijksterhuis; P De Vries
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2001-11

3.  The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks; Valerie Watson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  On perceptual readiness.

Authors:  J S BRUNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-03       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Melissa J Guynn; Gilles O Einstein; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention.

Authors:  Joel Lachter; Kenneth I Forster; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  An integrated theory of the mind.

Authors:  John R Anderson; Daniel Bothell; Michael D Byrne; Scott Douglass; Christian Lebiere; Yulin Qin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Ruthann Thomas; Sara Mayfield; Hilary Shank; Nova Morrisette; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

9.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

10.  Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Carrie L Williford; Jason L Pagan; R Key Dismukes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2003-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  When Distraction Holds Relevance: A Prospective Memory Benefit for Older Adults.

Authors:  Joana S Lourenço; Elizabeth A Maylor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Individual differences in distractibility: An update and a model.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2014-03-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.