Literature DB >> 7582213

Functional results of the double-stapled ileoanal reservoir.

P Reissman1, M Piccirillo, A Ulrich, N Daniel, J J Nogueras, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The preferred method for creation of an ileoanal reservoir is still controversial. We prospectively studied the functional and physiologic outcome of our patients who underwent a double-stapled ileoanal reservoir (DSIAR). STUDY
DESIGN: All consecutive patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with a DSIAR between 1988 and 1993 were evaluated. Functional results were assessed by questionnaires and anal manometry preoperatively and two, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: One hundred forty patients (90 males and 50 females) with a mean age of 40.7 (range, 12 to 71) years were evaluated. Of these, 107 patients (77 percent) had ulcerative colitis, 21 (15 percent) had familial adenomatous polyposis, six (4 percent) had indeterminate colitis, and six (4 percent) had a post-operative diagnosis of Crohn's disease. One hundred twenty-four (95 percent) of the 131 patients with closed stomas were available for functional and manometric evaluation at a mean follow-up period of 24 months. A 32 percent decline in the mean resting pressure (from 71.3 +/- 4 to 48.2 +/- 3.4 mm Hg) occurred early after DSIAR (p < 0.001) with partial recovery by 24 months. The maximal internal sphincter resting pressure showed a 39 percent decline (from 90.8 +/- 4.9 to 55.3 +/- 5.7 mm Hg, p < 0.005) with recovery after 12 months. There were no significant changes in the length of the high-pressure zone or mean or maximal squeeze pressures. A mean of 5.4 (two to 13) bowel movements occurred during the day and a mean of 1.2 (zero to four) occurred at night. Perfect or almost perfect continence was reported during the day and night, respectively, by 95 and 92 percent of the patients. Overall perioperative complications occurred in 30 patients (21 percent) including septic complications in eight (6 percent), and pouchitis in eight (6 percent). There was one postoperative death (0.7 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: Double-stapled ileoanal reservoir is associated with good subjective functional and objective physiologic results and has acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7582213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  8 in total

1.  Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N Saigusa; T Kurahashi; T Nakamura; H Sugimura; S Baba; H Konno; S Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases.

Authors:  S D Wexner; P Reissman; J Pfeifer; M Bernstein; N Geron
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Udo A Heuschen; Ulf Hinz; Erik H Allemeyer; Frank Autschbach; Josef Stern; Matthias Lucas; Christian Herfarth; Gundi Heuschen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Manfred Nagelschmidt; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Is age relevant to functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis?: prospective assessment of 122 cases.

Authors:  Y Takao; R Gilliland; J J Nogueras; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa.

Authors:  W T Reilly; J H Pemberton; B G Wolff; S Nivatvongs; R M Devine; W J Litchy; P B McIntyre
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Laparoscopic pouch surgery in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Anil K Hemandas; John T Jenkins
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2012
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.