Literature DB >> 7579489

CA15-3, CASA, MSA, and TPS as diagnostic serum markers in breast cancer.

P L Devine1, M A Duroux, R J Quin, M A McGuckin, G J Joy, B G Ward, C W Pollard.   

Abstract

This is the first comparison of the three mucin based tests CA15-3, CASA, and MSA, and the cytokeratin-related TPS assay in breast cancer. The mucin markers were superior to TPS in receiver-operator analysis, though no marker was of use in the diagnosis of malignancy due to low sensitivity. Using cutpoints that gave 95% specificity in benign disease (n = 83), corresponding sensitivities in pre-treatment breast cancer (n = 123: 13 in situ, 54 stage I, 45 stage II, 4 stage III, 7 stage IV) were 17% (CA15-3), 16% (CASA), 13% (MSA), and 8% (TPS), with a strong relationship between marker levels and disease stage. These assays did not always detect the same patients, and the use of CA15-3 combined with CASA gave the highest sensitivity (23%), though this was not significantly better than the use of CA15-3 alone. Despite detecting similar antigens, these assays can show markedly different responses in some patients, indicating that one mucin-based test cannot be substituted for another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7579489     DOI: 10.1007/BF00689716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of circulating CA15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  D F Hayes; V R Zurawski; D W Kufe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Monoclonal antibodies reactive with the breast carcinoma-associated mucin core protein repeat sequence peptide also recognise the ovarian carcinoma-associated sebaceous gland antigen.

Authors:  G T Layton; P L Devine; J A Warren; G Birrell; P X Xing; B G Ward; I F McKenzie
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  1990

3.  Synthetic peptides reactive with anti-human milk fat globule membrane monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  P X Xing; K Reynolds; J J Tjandra; X L Tang; I F McKenzie
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  The use of mucin-specific monoclonal antibodies and lectins in the detection of tumor-associated serum markers in gynecological cancer.

Authors:  P L Devine; M A McGuckin; L E Ramm; H Harada; B G Ward
Journal:  Cancer Biochem Biophys       Date:  1993-09

5.  Factors effecting the measurement of tumor-associated MUC1 mucins in serum.

Authors:  M A McGuckin; P L Devine; L E Ramm; B G Ward
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  1994

6.  Circulating tumour-associated mucin concentrations, determined by the CASA assay, in healthy women.

Authors:  M A McGuckin; L E Ramm; G J Joy; P L Devine; B G Ward
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1993-02-28       Impact factor: 3.786

7.  How can treatment response be measured in breast cancer patients?

Authors:  A van Dalen; D L van der Linde; K J Heering; A B van Oudalblas
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

8.  The management of ovarian carcinoma is improved by the use of cancer-associated serum antigen and CA 125 assays.

Authors:  B G Ward; M A McGuckin; L E Ramm; M Coglan; B Sanderson; L Tripcony; K E Free
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Tumour marker antigens during menses and pregnancy.

Authors:  Y Touitou; Y Darbois; A Bogdan; A Auzéby; S Keusseoglou
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Evaluation of MSA as a serum marker in breast cancer: a comparison with CEA.

Authors:  S A Stacker; N P Sacks; J Golder; J J Tjandra; C H Thompson; A Smithyman; I F McKenzie
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  MUC1 (CD227): a multi-tasked molecule.

Authors:  Vasso Apostolopoulos; Lily Stojanovska; Sharron E Gargosky
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Clinical significance of serum CA15-3 as a prognostic parameter during follow-up periods in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Won Gong Chu; Dong Won Ryu
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.859

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.