Literature DB >> 7579109

Continuous thermodilution cardiac output: agreement with Fick and bolus thermodilution methods.

D Thrush1, J B Downs, R A Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac outputs were determined with continuous thermodilution, bolus thermodilution, and the Fick method during pharmacologically varied hemodynamics.
DESIGN: Prospective comparison of techniques.
SETTING: University animal laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Swine.
INTERVENTIONS: Swine were anesthetized, tracheally intubated, and instrumented to measure continuous (QTDC) and bolus (QTDB) thermodilution cardiac outputs and sample arterial and mixed venous blood. Continuous thermodilution of blood was facilitated by computer modulation of a thermal filament wrapped around the portion of the pulmonary artery catheter residing in the right atrium and ventricle. QTDC was computed from the thermodilution curve monitored by the thermistor. Bolus thermodilution was performed in triplicate by injecting 10 mL of 5% dextrose in water (0 to 4 degrees C). Oxygen consumption (VO2) was calculated as the averaged minute rate of disappearance of spirometer oxygen over a 6-minute steady state. Cardiac output was determined with the direct Fick method (QF) by dividing VO2 by the difference in arterial and mixed venous oxygen content. Basal QTDC was increased and decreased with an intravenous infusion of dobutamine or labetalol, respectively. Data are summarized as mean +/- SD or 95% confidence interval (CI 95%). Agreement between methods of determining cardiac output was assessed by calculating bias, percent bias, and percent coefficient of determination (100 r2).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen swine (38.9 +/- 1.2 kg) exhibited a range of QTDC from 2.2 to 14.8 L/min. Mean measurement variance of VO2, CaO2, CvO2, and QTDB was 1.5%, 1.5%, 2.0%, and 11.8%, respectively. Mean bias, percent bias, and 100 r2 was 0.004 +/- 1.05 L/min (CI 95%: 0.18 to 0.19 L/min), -0.37 +/- 13.8% (CI 95%: -2.75 to 2.01), and 89% between QTDC and QF, respectively. Bias, percent bias, and 100 r2 was 0.05 +/- 1.09 L/min (CI 95%: -0.14 to 0.23 L/min, 1.21 +/- 13.06% (CI 95%: -1.03 to 3.46%), and 91% between QTDC and QTDB, respectively. Bias, percent bias, and 100 r2 (Fig 6) was -0.04 +/- 0.69 L/min (CI 95%: -0.16 to -.08 L/min), -1.23 +/- 9.17% (CI 95%: -2.8 to 0.35%), and 94% between QTDB and QF, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Automatic cardiac output computed with continuous thermodilution appears accurate and reliable. Also, good agreement was confirmed between cardiac output derived by continuous and bolus thermodilution methods and bolus thermodilution and Fick methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7579109     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-0770(05)80094-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  6 in total

1.  Estimation of cardiac output in a pharmacological trial using a simple method based on arterial blood pressure signal waveform: a comparison with pulmonary thermodilution and echocardiographic methods.

Authors:  Jani Penttilä; Amir Snapir; Erkki Kentala; Juha Koskenvuo; Jussi Posti; Mika Scheinin; Harry Scheinin; Tom Kuusela
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Results of the oxygen Fick method in a closed blood circulation model including "total arteriovenous diffusive shunt of oxygen".

Authors:  Mustafa Ozbek; Ahmet Akay
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.919

3.  Analysis of the accuracy of continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement. Comparison with intermittent thermodilution and Fick cardiac output measurement.

Authors:  L Jacquet; G Hanique; D Glorieux; P Matte; M Goenen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Accuracy of cardiac output measurements during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: according to the vessel anastomosis sites.

Authors:  Sung Yong Park; Dae Hee Kim; Han Bum Joe; Ji Young Yoo; Jin Soo Kim; Min Kang; Yong Woo Hong
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-05-24

5.  Pulse contour analysis: is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?

Authors:  Lester A H Critchley
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  The contemporary pulmonary artery catheter. Part 2: measurements, limitations, and clinical applications.

Authors:  I T Bootsma; E C Boerma; T W L Scheeren; F de Lange
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.502

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.