Literature DB >> 7578793

Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a three-dimensional photogrammetric technique.

T Jemt1, A Lie.   

Abstract

Distortions of 15 routine implant-supported prostheses were measured in relation to the master casts after completion by means of a 3-dimensional (3-D) photogrammetric technique. All prostheses were designed as one-piece gold-alloy castings with resin teeth. Five of the prostheses were placed in the edentulous maxilla, and the remaining were placed in the lower jaw. Distortion of the cylinders was mostly observed in the horizontal plane (x- and y-axis) while the vertical aspect seemed to be more stable. The mean 3-D center point distortion was 42 (SD 15) and 74 (SD 38) microns for the upper and lower jaws, respectively. The measurements revealed a range of 3-D center point distortion from 16 to 80 and 15 to 165 microns for the different jaws, respectively. The corresponding 3-D mean angular distortion of the cylinders was 51 (SD 35) microns in lower and 70 (SD 75) microns in the upper jaws. A correlation was found between 3-D center point distortion and the width as well as the curvature of the implant arch, indicating more displacement the wider and the more curved the arch was. The 3-D center point distortion was also significantly higher in the upper jaws which could possibly be explained by the curvature of the implant arch and higher numbers of implants in the upper jaws. Further problems with the fit of upper jaw castings could be related to more alloy in the castings and poor alignment of implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7578793     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060306.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  8 in total

1.  [3-dimensional photogrammetry assessment of facial contours].

Authors:  D Kakoschke; H Gäbel; D Schettler
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-02

2.  Implant-supported fixed restoration of post-traumatic mandibular defect accompanied with skin grafting: A clinical report.

Authors:  Kwantae Noh; Woo-Jin Choi; Ahran Pae
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods.

Authors:  Sang-Jik Lee; Sung-Bum Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implant-abutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis.

Authors:  Renato Sussumu Nishioka; Lea Nogueira Braulino de Melo Nishioka; Celina Wanderley Abreu; Luis Gustavo Oliveira de Vasconcellos; Ivan Balducci
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  A new method to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch: A pilot study.

Authors:  Mikel Iturrate; Erlantz Lizundia; Xabier Amezua; Eneko Solaberrieta
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 6.  Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  María Isabel Albanchez-González; Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann; Jesús Peláez-Rico; Carlos López-Suárez; Verónica Rodríguez-Alonso; María Jesús Suárez-García
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.

Authors:  Bowen Ma; Xinxin Yue; Yujie Sun; Lingyan Peng; Wei Geng
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: an in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs.

Authors:  Ruoxuan Huang; Yuanxiang Liu; Baoxin Huang; Fengxing Zhou; Zhuofan Chen; Zhipeng Li
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.