Literature DB >> 7578785

Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth.

C H Hämmerle1, D Wagner, U Brägger, A Lussi, A Karayiannis, A Joss, N P Lang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the threshold of tactile perception of endosseous dental implants and to assess the relative difference of that threshold between implants and teeth. Twenty-two subjects with implants of the ITI Dental Implant System were included in the study. All implants served as abutments for single tooth crowns and had been in function for a minimum of 1 year. A strain gauge glued to the shaft of an amalgam plugger served as a force sensor. It transformed the elastic deformation exerted onto the shaft into an electronic signal for recording. By use of the amalgam plugger, a continuously increasing force was exercised on the implants or teeth until the first sensation of touch was indicated by the patient. Statistical analysis revealed threshold values for the implants ranging from 13.2 to 189.4 g (1 g = 0.01 N) (mean 100.6; SD 47.7), while a range of 1.2 to 26.2 g (mean 11.5; SD 11.5) was found for control teeth. Thus, the mean threshold values for implants were 8.75 times higher than for teeth. This difference was highly statistically significant. A general linear models procedure was applied to determine the influence of patient age, jaw, implant position and the threshold values of teeth on the measurements obtained for implants. Only gender and the threshold values for contralateral teeth had a significant influence. These 2 parameters together explained 27% of the variability in threshold measurements. It is concluded that a more than 8-fold higher threshold value for tactile perception exists for implants compared with teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7578785     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060203.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  15 in total

1.  The contents of dental implant patient information leaflets available within the UK.

Authors:  J Barber; J Puryer; L McNally; D O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Fully functional bioengineered tooth replacement as an organ replacement therapy.

Authors:  Etsuko Ikeda; Ritsuko Morita; Kazuhisa Nakao; Kentaro Ishida; Takashi Nakamura; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto; Miho Ogawa; Mitsumasa Mizuno; Shohei Kasugai; Takashi Tsuji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results.

Authors:  Claudio Cacaci; Friederike Cantner; Thomas Mücke; Peter Randelzhofer; Jan Hajtó; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of implant versus tooth-supported zirconia-based single crowns in a split-mouth design: a 4-year clinical follow-up study.

Authors:  Mustafa Barış Güncü; Umut Cakan; Guliz Aktas; Güliz Nigar Güncü; Şenay Canay
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Muscular activity may improve in edentulous patients after implant treatment.

Authors:  Kelvin I Afrashtehfar; Martin Schimmel
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2016-12

6.  Patient satisfaction with oral implant rehabilitation: evaluation of responses to a questionnaire.

Authors:  Susanna Annibali; Anna Rita Vestri; Annalisa Pilotto; Gerardo La Monaca; Stefano Di Carlo; Maria Paola Cristalli
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2011-02-13

7.  The effect of computed tomographic scanner parameters and 3-dimensional volume rendering techniques on the accuracy of linear, angular, and volumetric measurements of the mandible.

Authors:  Brian J Whyms; Houri K Vorperian; Lindell R Gentry; Eugene M Schimek; Edward T Bersu; Moo K Chung
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2013-05

8.  Implant placement under existing removable dental prostheses and its effect on masticatory performance.

Authors:  S Wolfart; K Wolf; S Brunzel; M Wolfart; A Caliebe; M Kern
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of cerebral cortex activation induced by tactile stimulation between natural teeth and implants.

Authors:  Daiki Sekido; Takero Otsuka; Tateshi Shimazaki; Akinori Ohno; Kei Fuchigami; Koudai Nagata; Tetsutaro Yamaguchi; Katsuhiko Kimoto
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-11-01

10.  Effect of difference in occlusal contact area of mandibular free-end edentulous area implants on periodontal mechanosensitive threshold of adjacent premolars.

Authors:  Rie Terauchi; Korenori Arai; Masahiro Tanaka; Takayoshi Kawazoe; Shunsuke Baba
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.