Literature DB >> 7576676

Comparison of sevoflurane and halothane anesthesia in children undergoing outpatient ear, nose, and throat surgery.

J C Greenspun1, R S Hannallah, L G Welborn, J M Norden.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare the induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients undergoing adenoidectomy with or without myringotomies (BMTs). To compare the hemodynamic effects of the two drugs.
DESIGN: Open, randomized study.
SETTING: University-affiliated pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: 39 ASA physical status I children aged 12 months to 12 years undergoing adenoidectomies with or without BMTs.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive sevoflurane or halothane in 60% nitrous oxide (N2O) for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. All patients received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg orally as premedication, as well as fentanyl 1 mcg/kg intravenously (i.v.) immediately following induction. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg i.v. Anesthesia was maintained with an end-tidal concentration corresponding to 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of each drug until the end of surgery, at which time all anesthetic gases were discontinued simultaneously. Emergence (extubation), recovery (Steward score = 6), and discharge times were compared among patients in both groups. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure were compared at predetermined intervals. Additional fentanyl was administered after full recovery was documented for an objective pain score of at least 6.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Emergence from anesthesia was significantly faster (7.11 +/- 3.05 minutes vs. 9.58 +/- 5.12 minutes) and recovery (19.89 +/- 10.07 minutes vs. 31.08 +/- 9.81 minutes) more rapid in the sevoflurane group. However, there was no difference in the time to meet home discharge criteria (184 +/- 49 minutes vs. 189 +/- 48 minutes). HR was consistently maintained at or above baseline in the sevoflurane group. Blood pressure was significantly more depressed after fentanyl administration in the halothane group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative vomiting between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane provides a faster anesthetic emergence and recovery than halothane in premedicated patients but it does not expedite meeting current home discharge criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7576676     DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00071-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  6 in total

1.  Inhalation induction of anaesthesia.

Authors:  G V Goresky; J Muir
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Anesthesia for pediatric ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  Raafat S Hannallah
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Clinical and economic factors important to anaesthetic choice for day-case surgery.

Authors:  E I Eger; P F White; M S Bogetz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of sevoflurane.

Authors:  M Behne; H J Wilke; S Harder
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Perioperative airway management of a patient with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.

Authors:  Masanori Tsukamoto; Takashi Hitosugi; Takeshi Yokoyama
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-12-31

6.  Clinical signs and electroencephalographic patterns of emergence from sevoflurane anaesthesia in children: An observational study.

Authors:  Laura Cornelissen; Carolina Donado; Johanna M Lee; Norah E Liang; Ian Mills; Andrea Tou; Aykut Bilge; Charles B Berde
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.330

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.