Literature DB >> 7575970

Characterization of treated porcelain surfaces via dynamic contact angle analysis.

R D Phoenix1, C Shen.   

Abstract

Successful porcelain repair requires conditioning of porcelain surfaces. Conditioning is intended to facilitate wetting by repair materials and improve interfacial bonding. The objective of this investigation was to determine the effects of selected surface treatments upon the wettability of a representative feldspathic porcelain. Dynamic contact angle analysis and scanning electron microscopy were used to characterize the effects of such treatments. Standardized porcelain specimens were subjected to the following five treatment regimens: (1) control (no treatment); (2) airborne particle abrasion using 50 microns aluminum oxide; (3) etching with ammonium bifluoride gel; (4) etching with acidulated phosphate fluoride gel; and (5) etching with hydrofluoric acid gel. Following treatment, specimens were cleansed and dried. Advancing contact angles were quantified using dynamic contact angle analysis. Mean values and 95% confidence intervals were (in degrees): control, 63.8 +/- 2.7; ammonium bifluoride, 39.4 +/- 2.0; airborne particle abrading, 29.1 +/- 2.9; acidulated phosphate fluoride, 24.9 +/- 1.7; and hydrofluoric acid, 16.5 +/- 1.2. Significant differences were found between all treatment groups (P = .05). Subsequent scanning electron microscopy examination of treated surfaces indicated lesser contact angles were associated with surfaces displaying deeper and wider grooves. Apparently, the resultant increase in surface area produces increased wettability. It is inferred that an increase in surface area may correspond to enhanced resin-porcelain bonding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7575970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of surfaces and adhesive interfaces of enamel and dentin after different treatments.

Authors:  Michelle Alexandra Chinelatti; Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona; Maria Cristina Borsatto; Lilian Faria Ribeiro; Renata Andréa Salvitti de Sá Rocha; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength in two different ceramic systems.

Authors:  Tevfik Yavuz; Erhan Dilber; Haluk Baris Kara; Ali Riza Tuncdemir; A Nilgun Ozturk
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Determining efficacy of monitoring devices on ceramic bond to resin composite.

Authors:  Estrella Osorio; Fátima S Aguilera; Raquel Osorio; Franklin García-Godoy; Miguel A Cabrerizo-Vilchez; Manuel Toledano
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-09-01

4.  Effect of four different surface treatments on shear bond strength of three porcelain repair systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ritesh Gourav; Padma Ariga; Ashish R Jain; Jacob Mathew Philip
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-05

5.  Microshear bond strength of composite resins to enamel and porcelain substrates utilizing unfilled versus filled resins.

Authors:  Ahmad Najafi-Abrandabadi; Siamak Najafi-Abrandabadi; Amir Ghasemi; Philip G Kotick
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-11

6.  Surface properties of a new lithium disilicate glass-ceramic after grinding.

Authors:  Larissa Natiele Miotto; Mariana de Oliveira Carlos Villas-Bôas; Edgar Dutra Zanotto; Eduardo Bellini Ferreira; Laiza Maria Grassi Fais; Lígia Antunes Pereira Pinelli
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Orthodontic bonding to silicate ceramics: impact of different pretreatment methods on shear bond strength between ceramic restorations and ceramic brackets.

Authors:  Rebecca Jungbauer; Christian Kirschneck; Christian M Hammer; Peter Proff; Daniel Edelhoff; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Effect of surface treatments on the spreading velocity of simplified adhesive systems.

Authors:  Flávia B Pazinatto; Fernanda A Lopes; Luiz Marquezini Junior; Fabrício L A de Castro; Maria Teresa Atta
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Influence of silane and heated silane on the bond strength of lithium disilicate ceramics - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Tariq Abduljabbar; Mohammed Ayedh AlQahtani; Zaid Al Jeaidi; Fahim Vohra
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.