Literature DB >> 7574829

Skin type, but neither race nor gender, influence epidermal permeability barrier function.

J T Reed1, R Ghadially, P M Elias.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
DESIGN: Previous studies that compared transepidermal water loss in subjects of different race and sex showed minimal differences in basal permeability barrier function. These studies often did not assess the ability of the stratum corneum to withstand or recover from insults to the epidermal permeability barrier. We compared epidermal permeability barrier function in the following human subjects (age range, 22 to 38 years): white (n = 8) vs Asian (n = 6); male (n = 7) vs female (n = 7); and skin type II/III (n = 14) vs skin type V/VI (n = 7) (scale, I to VI). Basal transepidermal water loss was measured by evaporimetry (three sites) on the volar aspect of the forearm. Barrier integrity then was assessed by determining the number of tape strippings required to reach a transepidermal water loss greater than or equal to 20 g/m2 per hour. The rates of barrier recovery then were compared at 6, 24, and 48 hours and 1 week after abrogation.
RESULTS: Neither the number of tape strippings required to perturb the barrier nor the rates of barrier recovery were significantly different in white vs Asian subjects or in female vs male subjects. However, patients with skin types II/III required only 29.6 +/- 2.4 tape strippings to perturb the barrier, while the skin type V/VI group required 66.7 +/- 6.9 tape strippings. Furthermore, while barrier function in skin type II/III recovered by approximately 20% by 6 hours and 55% by 48 hours, barrier function in skin type V/VI, independent of race, recovered more quickly, 43% and 72% at 6 and 48 hours, respectively. Finally, neither the differences in barrier integrity nor in rates of recovery could be attributed to variations in cohesiveness, since stripping appears to remove the same weight of stratum corneum in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Darkly pigmented skin displays both a more resistant barrier and one that recovers more quickly after perturbation by tape stripping than does the skin of individuals with lighter pigmentation. These findings have potential implications for transdermal delivery of topical or systemic therapeutic agents, the ability of individuals with different skin types to withstand environmental or occupational insults, and the influence of acquired hyperpigmentation or pigment loss to influence permeability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7574829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol        ISSN: 0003-987X


  34 in total

1.  Cutaneous resonance running time varies with age, body site and gender in a normal Chinese population.

Authors:  Shujun Xin; Wenyan Man; Joachim W Fluhr; Shunpeng Song; Peter M Elias; Mao-Qiang Man
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Epidermal permeability barrier recovery is delayed in vitiligo-involved sites.

Authors:  J Liu; W Y Man; C Z Lv; S P Song; Y J Shi; P M Elias; M Q Man
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Generation of a three-dimensional full thickness skin equivalent and automated wounding.

Authors:  Angela Rossi; Antje Appelt-Menzel; Szymon Kurdyn; Heike Walles; Florian Groeber
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Skin care in ethnic populations.

Authors:  Patrick D Cole; Daniel A Hatef; Susan Taylor; Jamal M Bullocks
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration.

Authors:  Johan du Plessis; Aleksandr Stefaniak; Fritz Eloff; Swen John; Tove Agner; Tzu-Chieh Chou; Rosemary Nixon; Markus Steiner; Anja Franken; Irena Kudla; Linn Holness
Journal:  Skin Res Technol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Barrier requirements as the evolutionary "driver" of epidermal pigmentation in humans.

Authors:  Peter M Elias; Gopinathan Menon; Bruce K Wetzel; John Jack W Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.937

7.  pH-regulated mechanisms account for pigment-type differences in epidermal barrier function.

Authors:  Roshan Gunathilake; Nanna Y Schurer; Brenda A Shoo; Anna Celli; Jean-Pierre Hachem; Debra Crumrine; Ganga Sirimanna; Kenneth R Feingold; Theodora M Mauro; Peter M Elias
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 8.551

8.  Effect of a water-based no-sting, protective barrier formulation and a solvent-containing similar formulation on skin protection from medical adhesive trauma.

Authors:  Ronald J Shannon; Debashish Chakravarthy
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Genetic Ancestry, Skin Reflectance and Pigmentation Genotypes in Association with Serum Vitamin D Metabolite Balance.

Authors:  Robin Taylor Wilson; Alanna N Roff; P Jenny Dai; Tracey Fortugno; Jonathan Douds; Gang Chen; Gary L Grove; Sheila Ongeri Nikiforova; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Tony Frudakis; Vernon M Chinchilli; Terryl J Hartman; Laurence M Demers; Mark D Shriver; Victor A Canfield; Keith C Cheng
Journal:  Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig       Date:  2011-09

10.  Re-appraisal of current theories for the development and loss of epidermal pigmentation in hominins and modern humans.

Authors:  Peter M Elias; Mary L Williams
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.