Literature DB >> 7573632

Treating early-stage breast cancer: hospital characteristics associated with breast-conserving surgery.

M E Johantgen1, R M Coffey, D R Harris, H Levy, J J Clinton.   

Abstract

Despite growing acceptance of the fact that women with early-stage breast cancer have similar outcomes with lumpectomy plus radiation as with mastectomy, many studies have revealed the uneven adoption of such breast-conserving surgery. Discharge data from the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project, representing multiple payers, locations, and hospital types, demonstrate increasing trends in breast-conserving surgery as a proportion of breast cancer surgeries from 1981 to 1987. Women with axillary node involvement were less likely to have a lumpectomy, even though consensus recommendations do not preclude this form of treatment when local metastases are present. Non-White race, urban hospital location, and hospital teaching were associated with an increased likelihood of having breast-conserving surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7573632      PMCID: PMC1615611          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.10.1432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  10 in total

1.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Regional differences in surgical management of breast cancer.

Authors:  R T Osteen; G D Steele; H R Menck; D P Winchester
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer.

Authors:  D A Lazovich; E White; D B Thomas; R E Moe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-12-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Trends in conserving treatment of invasive carcinoma of the breast in females.

Authors:  G M Swanson; E R Satariano; W A Satariano; J R Osuch
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-12

Review 5.  Selection of breast-preservation therapy for primary invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  B Cady; M D Stone
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; M S Gottlieb; J Veum; D Yahnke; J S Goodwin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer.

Authors:  D C Farrow; W C Hunt; J M Samet
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Nonclinical factors associated with surgery received for treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  E R Satariano; G M Swanson; P P Moll
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; R Margolese; R Poisson; Y Pilch; C Redmond; E Fisher; N Wolmark; M Deutsch; E Montague
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Hospital variables associated with quality of care for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  R Hand; S Sener; J Imperato; J S Chmiel; J A Sylvester; A Fremgen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-12-25       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Increasing trends in the use of breast-conserving surgery in California.

Authors:  C R Morris; R Cohen; R Schlag; W E Wright
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Breast cancer outcomes among older women: HMO, fee-for-service, and delivery system comparisons.

Authors:  A Lee-Feldstein; P J Feldstein; T Buchmueller; G Katterhagen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Receipt of delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy: do women revisit the decision?

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Barbara Salem; Ann Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven Katz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Selection of treatment among Latina and non-Latina white women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Celia P Kaplan; Anna M Nápoles; E Shelley Hwang; Joan Bloom; Susan Stewart; Dana Nickleach; Leah Karliner
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Variations in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer in Quebec between 1988 and 1994.

Authors:  N Hébert-Croteau; J Brisson; J Latreille; C Blanchette; L Deschênes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-10-19       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Trends in breast conserving surgery among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, 1992-2000.

Authors:  Mita Sanghavi Goel; Risa B Burns; Russell S Phillips; Roger B Davis; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Racial differences in patterns of care among medicaid-enrolled patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen Kimmick; Fabian Camacho; Kristi Long Foley; Edward A Levine; Rajesh Balkrishnan; Roger Anderson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with breast conservation surgery. A statewide analysis in North Carolina.

Authors:  C A Kotwall; D L Covington; R Rutledge; M P Churchill; A A Meyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Vanessa L Jacoby; Amy Autry; Gavin Jacobson; Robert Domush; Sanae Nakagawa; Alison Jacoby
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.661

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.