Literature DB >> 7571467

A target in real motion appears blurred in the absence of other proximal moving targets.

S Chen1, H E Bedell, H Oğmen.   

Abstract

For exposure durations longer than about 40 msec, a field of dots in sampled motion has been reported to appear less smeared than predicted from the visual persistence of static displays. This reduction of perceived smear has been attributed to a motion "deblurring" mechanism. However, it has been long recognized that an isolated target moving continuously in a dark field appears to be extensively smeared. To reconcile these apparently contradictory observations, we investigated the effect of dot density on the extent of perceived smear for a single moving dot and for fields of dots with densities ranging from 0.75 to 7.5 dots/deg2. Bright targets were presented in continuous motion against a photopically illuminated background field. The results reconcile previous conflicting observations by showing that the length of perceived smear decreases systematically with dot density for exposure durations longer than about 50 msec. In three additional experiments, we arranged the spatial configuration of the targets to evaluate whether motion deblurring results primarily from a motion compensation mechanism (such as integration within the spatiotemporally oriented receptive fields of putative motion mechanisms) or from inhibition exerted by spatiotemporally adjacent targets. The results show that the activation of motion mechanisms is not a sufficient condition for motion deblurring and that the reduction of perceived smear requires the presence of spatiotemporally adjacent targets. Taken together, these findings suggest that motion deblurring results primarily from masking exerted by spatiotemporally proximal targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7571467     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00308-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Seeing blur: 'motion sharpening' without motion.

Authors:  Mark A Georgeson; Stephen T Hammett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Attenuation of perceived motion smear during vergence and pursuit tracking.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Ozgur Yilmaz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The attenuation of perceived motion smear during combined eye and head movements.

Authors:  Jianliang Tong; Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The perception of motion smear during eye and head movements.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Jianliang Tong; Murat Aydin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The temporal impulse response function in infantile nystagmus.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Mahalakshmi Ramamurthy; Saumil S Patel; Shobana Subramaniam; Lan-Phuong Vu-Yu; Jianliang Tong
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Cortical dynamics of lateral inhibition: visual persistence and ISI.

Authors:  G Francis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-10

8.  Sharpening vision by adapting to flicker.

Authors:  Derek H Arnold; Jeremy D Williams; Natasha E Phipps; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations.

Authors:  Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

10.  Motion deblurring during pursuit tracking improves spatial-interval acuity.

Authors:  Michael J Moulder; Jin Qian; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.