Literature DB >> 7571216

A modification of standard percutaneous nephrolithotripsy technique for the morbidly obese patient.

J G Giblin1, S Lossef, J J Pahira.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Urolithiasis in the morbidly obese patient presents several unique challenges to the urologist, and its treatment often requires creativity and innovation. We present a new modification of standard percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PNL) technique, which is very helpful in overcoming some of the problems that are encountered when performing PNL in this group of patients.
METHODS: We present 5 patients in whom this new technique has been used. Each had either failed prior extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) therapy or their size and abdominal girth precluded use of ESWL technology. All 5 patients underwent PNL. The radiographically measured skin-to-stone distances (determined by computed tomography or ultrasonography or both) exceeded the lengths of the standard percutaneous access sheaths and the 26 F rigid nephroscope. Thus larger and longer Amplatz access sheaths and a 30 F gynecologic laparoscope were used to reach the stones. Standard ultrasonic lithotripsy was then performed, and extralong bronchoscopic grasping forceps were used to remove stone fragments.
RESULTS: All 5 patients were rendered stone-free using this technique. There was no significant perioperative morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: For this very challenging group of patients, the use of larger and longer access sheaths and the gynecologic laparoscope have been very effective additions to the urologists' armamentarium in the treatment of urolithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7571216     DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80260-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

1.  Effect of body mass index on operative time, hospital stay, stone clearance, postoperative complications, and postoperative analgesic requirement in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Durre Shohab; Ramsha Ayub; Muhammad Umar Alam; Amna Butt; Sanam Sheikh; Salman Assad; Saeed Akhter
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-12

2.  Impact of body mass index on clinical outcomes associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Fahad A Alyami; Thomas A A Skinner; Richard W Norman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Does body mass index effect the success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Abdülmuttalip Şimşek; Faruk Özgör; Mehmet Fatih Akbulut; Onur Küçüktopçu; Ahmet Yalçın Berberoğlu; Ömer Sarılar; Murat Binbay; Ahmet Yaser Müslümanoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-06

4.  The impact of body mass on management of patients with renal colic.

Authors:  Nicholas Tentolouris; Sotirios Charamoglis; Ioannis Anastasiou; Efraim Serafetinides; Dionisios Mitropoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.