Literature DB >> 7566903

Refractive variation during autorefraction: multivariate distribution of refractive status.

A Rubin1, W F Harris.   

Abstract

The refractive variation of a sample of 106 university students (63 females and 43 males) studying optometry was examined by means of autorefraction. Stereo-pair scatter plots in Euclidean three-dimensional h-space are used to illustrate the nature of the spread or distribution of data measurements found in particular subjects. A wide variety of different distributions were observed ranging from tightly to loosely clustered arrangements of measurements. Some aspects of departure from multivariate normality, including outliers (atypical measurements in a sample) and polymodal or multimodal distributions, are demonstrated. Outliers appear to be possible anywhere in the space of the scatter plots, although outliers may be more common in the region of h-space corresponding to transitory increases in accommodation. Multimodal distributions may be indicative of changes in ocular fixation during autorefraction or may reflect accommodative or other anomalies. Other departures from multivariate normality such as kurtosis and skewness are also of importance when attempting to form an understanding of variation of refractive state. Measurements made on an artificial or test eye showed very tight clusters in h-space. This suggests that the autorefractor itself contributes little to the variation observed during autorefraction of an eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7566903     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199506000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  7 in total

1.  Screening for refractive errors in children: accuracy of the hand held refractor Retinomax to screen for astigmatism.

Authors:  M Cordonnier; M Dramaix
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The usefulness of the Retinomax autorefractor for childhood screening validated against a Danish preterm cohort examined at the age of 4 years.

Authors:  H C Fledelius; R Bangsgaard; C Slidsborg; M laCour
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Eye shape using partial coherence interferometry, autorefraction, and SD-OCT.

Authors:  Christopher A Clark; Ann E Elsner; Benjamin J Konynenbelt
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Interexaminer reproducibility for subjective refractions for an ametropic participant.

Authors:  Solani David Mathebula; Alan Rubin
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-11

5.  Design and validation of an infrared Badal optometer for laser speckle.

Authors:  Danielle F W Teel; R James Copland; Robert J Jacobs; Thad Wells; Daniel R Neal; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Repeatability of ARK-30 in a pediatric population.

Authors:  Laura Hernandez-Moreno; Ana Vallelado-Alvarez; Raul Martin
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 7.  Dioptric power and refractive behaviour: a review of methods and applications.

Authors:  Alan Rubin; Tanya Evans; Nabeela Hasrod
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.