Literature DB >> 7565868

Impact of age and environment on somatic mutation at the hprt gene of T lymphocytes in humans.

I M Jones1, C B Thomas, B Tucker, C L Thompson, P Pleshanov, I Vorobtsova, D H Moore.   

Abstract

Analysis of two human populations for dependence of somatic mutation on age has revealed both similarities and differences. The studies performed employed peripheral blood lymphocytes and measured the efficiency with which these cells form clones in vitro (cloning efficiency, CE) and the frequency of cells with inactivating mutations of the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (mutant frequency, MF). The people studied were between 19 and 64 years of age. In one population, composed of 78 never smokers and 140 current smokers from the United States (US), both CE and MF were dependent on age: CE declined with age (p = 0.005); MF increased 0.15 per 10(6) cells per year of age for nonsmokers (p < 0.001) and at 1.3 times that rate for smokers (p = 0.01). In the second population, 80 people of unknown smoking status from Russia, the increase in MF per year was even greater, 2.5 times that of the US nonsmokers (p = 0.001) but the dependence of CE on age was the same as for the US population (p = 0.043). Because the increase of MF of the Russians with age is 2-fold greater than that of the US smokers, the intensity of smoking and/or other environmental exposures, or the susceptibility to these exposures, must account for the difference in age dependent MF increase, not the proportion of Russians that are smokers. Differences in the lymphocyte subpopulations that survived the longer transit from Russia may have contributed to the observed differences in MF. However, overall, the mutant frequency results suggest that the Russians were chronically exposed to higher levels of agents that induce somatic mutation and that, on an age adjusted basis, the Russia population studied is at increased risk for health consequences from accumulated genetic damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7565868     DOI: 10.1016/0921-8734(95)00018-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  12 in total

Review 1.  Somatic mutations in aging, cancer and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Scott R Kennedy; Lawrence A Loeb; Alan J Herr
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 2.  Genome instability: cancer or aging?

Authors:  Jan Vijg; Martijn E T Dollé
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 3.  DNA double-strand breaks: a potential causative factor for mammalian aging?

Authors:  Han Li; James R Mitchell; Paul Hasty
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 4.  A high-fidelity method for genomic sequencing of single somatic cells reveals a very high mutational burden.

Authors:  Jan Vijg; Xiao Dong; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-07

Review 5.  Genome instability: a conserved mechanism of ageing?

Authors:  Jan Vijg; Xiao Dong; Brandon Milholland; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 8.000

Review 6.  Cancer Immunotherapy: Whence and Whither.

Authors:  Peter J Stambrook; John Maher; Farzin Farzaneh
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 7.  Genome dynamics and transcriptional deregulation in aging.

Authors:  R Busuttil; R Bahar; J Vijg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Future research directions to characterize environmental mutagens in highly polluted area.

Authors:  R J Srám
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Aging genomes: a necessary evil in the logic of life.

Authors:  Jan Vijg
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 10.  Changes in DNA repair during aging.

Authors:  Vera Gorbunova; Andrei Seluanov; Zhiyong Mao; Christpher Hine
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.