Literature DB >> 7563355

Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.

M Ohori1, T M Wheeler, M W Kattan, Y Goto, P T Scardino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens was assessed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The interval to progression (increasing prostate specific antigen level) was measured in 478 patients by status of the surgical margins.
RESULTS: At 5 years, the nonprogression rate was 64% for patients with and 83% for those without positive surgical margins. With a high grade cancer, seminal vesicle invasion or lymph node metastases, positive surgical margins had no effect on prognosis; with extracapsular extension and a Gleason score of 6 or less positive surgical margins were associated with a higher progression rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis was adversely affected by positive surgical margins only in moderately differentiated cancers with extracapsular extension alone. If the cancer is otherwise confined, positive surgical margins are associated with an excellent prognosis unlikely to be improved by adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7563355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  55 in total

1.  Preoperative circulating sex hormones are not predictors of positive surgical margins at open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrea Salonia; Andrea Gallina; Firas Abdollah; Alberto Briganti; Umberto Capitanio; Nazareno Suardi; Matteo Ferrari; Marco Raber; Renzo Colombo; Massimo Freschi; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Spontaneous but not experimental metastatic activities differentiate primary tumor-derived vs metastasis-derived mouse prostate cancer cell lines.

Authors:  S J Hall; T C Thompson
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Seminal vesicle invasion by prostate cancer: prognostic significance and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  S R Potter; J I Epstein; A W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

4.  Laparoscopic prostatectomy: where do we stand?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

Review 5.  Value of frozen section biopsies during radical prostatectomy: significance of the histological results.

Authors:  Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus; Robert Rabenalt; Sunjay Jain; Minh Do; Evangelos Liatsikos; Roman Ganzer; Lars-Christian Horn; Martin Burchardt; Fernando Jiménez-Cruz; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Do robotic prostatectomy positive surgical margins occur in the same location as extraprostatic extension?

Authors:  Matthew T Johnson; Mitchell L Ramsey; Joshua J Ebel; Ronney Abaza; Debra L Zynger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Evaluating radical prostatectomy specimens: therapeutic and prognostic importance.

Authors:  D G Bostwick; R Montironi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  Localized prostate cancer: early intervention or expectant therapy?

Authors:  T R Griffiths; D E Neal
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Surgical Approach Does Not Impact Margin Status After Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Masses.

Authors:  Abimbola Ayangbesan; David M Golombos; Ron Golan; Padraic O'Malley; Patrick Lewicki; Xian Wu; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Impact of capsular incision on biochemical recurrence after radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  K W Kwak; H M Lee; H Y Choi
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.