Literature DB >> 29914269

Surgical Approach Does Not Impact Margin Status After Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Masses.

Abimbola Ayangbesan1, David M Golombos2, Ron Golan1, Padraic O'Malley3, Patrick Lewicki1, Xian Wu4, Douglas S Scherr1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While surgical approach has recently been associated with positive surgical margin (PSM) after partial nephrectomy (PN) for small (<4 cm) renal masses, its impact on margin status for large (>4 cm) masses is unclear. We sought to evaluate the relationship between margin and surgical approach in patients undergoing PN for large renal masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified patients undergoing PN for pathological T1b and T2a renal-cell carcinoma diagnosed from 2010 to 2013. Conversions to open surgery were also included in our analysis. The primary outcome was surgical margin status. Multivariable regression modeling was performed to identify factors associated with PSM. A propensity score matching analysis was then performed to evaluate the impact of margin status on overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Of the 7495 patients undergoing PN for pT1b and pT2a renal masses over the study period, 504 (6.7%) had PSM. On multivariable analysis, surgical approach (laparoscopic or robot assisted vs open) was not significantly associated with surgical margin (p = 0.12 and p = 0.44, respectively). Tumor stage (T2a vs T1b) also showed no significant association (p = 0.18). A subsequent multivariable analysis using clinical staging showed that surgical approach (p = 0.28 and p = 0.54, respectively), tumor stage (p = 0.78), and conversion-to-open surgery (p = 0.98) had no significant association with PSM. Propensity score matched analysis showed that PSM was not significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio 0.95 [95% confidence interval 0.47-1.92] p = 0.88).
CONCLUSION: In a contemporary nation-wide cohort, surgical approach was not associated with an increased risk of PSM for large, noninvasive renal masses. Furthermore, increased size from T1b to T2a was not associated with an increased risk of PSM. These data suggest that surgical approach should be selected by surgeon comfort level with an individual tumor, rather than the size of the tumor itself.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinoma; kidney; minimally invasive surgical procedures; nephrectomy; nephron-sparing surgery; surgical margins

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29914269      PMCID: PMC6918521          DOI: 10.1089/end.2018.0144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  28 in total

1.  A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hendrik Van Poppel; Luigi Da Pozzo; Walter Albrecht; Vsevolod Matveev; Aldo Bono; Andrzej Borkowski; Marc Colombel; Laurence Klotz; Eila Skinner; Thomas Keane; Sandrine Marreaud; Sandra Collette; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass.

Authors:  Steven C Campbell; Andrew C Novick; Arie Belldegrun; Michael L Blute; George K Chow; Ithaar H Derweesh; Martha M Faraday; Jihad H Kaouk; Raymond J Leveillee; Surena F Matin; Paul Russo; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  [Predictors of positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: retrospective analysis on 298 consecutive patients].

Authors:  Riccardo Schiavina; Marco Borghesi; Francesco Chessa; Simona Rizzi; Giuseppe Martorana
Journal:  Urologia       Date:  2014-04-14

4.  "Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Jie Cai; Matthew N Simmons; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses.

Authors:  Christopher J Weight; Benjamin T Larson; Amr F Fergany; Tianming Gao; Brian R Lane; Steven C Campbell; Jihad H Kaouk; Eric A Klein; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  [Does a tumor size higher than 7cm impact partial nephrectomy outcomes for the treatment of renal cancer?].

Authors:  T Benoit; F X Nouhaud; M Roumiguié; O Mérigot De Treigny; M Thoulouzan; N Doumerc; L Bellec; X Gamé; P Rischmann; M Soulié; E Huyghe; J B Beauval
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 0.915

7.  Partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥ 7 cm: technical, oncological and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Daniel J Canter; Alexander Kutikov; Tianyu Li; Jay Simhan; Marc Smaldone; Ervin Teper; Rosalia Viterbo; Stephen A Boorjian; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Epidemiology of anesthesia-related mortality in the United States, 1999-2005.

Authors:  Guohua Li; Margaret Warner; Barbara H Lang; Lin Huang; Lena S Sun
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Petra Macaskill; M Luke Marinovich; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Positive Surgical Margins Increase Risk of Recurrence after Partial Nephrectomy for High Risk Renal Tumors.

Authors:  Paras H Shah; Daniel M Moreira; Zhamshid Okhunov; Vinay R Patel; Sameer Chopra; Aria A Razmaria; Manaf Alom; Arvin K George; Oksana Yaskiv; Michael J Schwartz; Mihir Desai; Manish A Vira; Lee Richstone; Jaime Landman; Arieh L Shalhav; Inderbir Gill; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 7.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.