Literature DB >> 7563152

Comparison of the effects of a pure steroidal antiestrogen with those of tamoxifen in a model of human breast cancer.

C K Osborne1, E B Coronado-Heinsohn, S G Hilsenbeck, B L McCue, A E Wakeling, R A McClelland, D L Manning, R I Nicholson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen, a nonsteroidal estrogen antagonist, is the most prescribed drug for the treatment of breast cancer. The use of tamoxifen is limited, however, by the development of resistance to this compound in most patients. Although tamoxifen behaves primarily as an estrogen antagonist, it has agonist (or growth-stimulatory) activity as well. ICI 182,780 is a 7 alpha-alkylsulfinyl analogue of estradiol lacking agonist activity. The absence of agonist activity may make this steroidal antiestrogen superior to tamoxifen in suppressing tumor cell growth.
PURPOSE: We compared the inhibitory effects of ICI 182,780, tamoxifen, and estrogen withdrawal on the growth of established tumors and on tumorigenesis in a model system that uses estrogen-dependent, human MCF-7 breast tumor cells growing in athymic nude mice. We also studied the hormonal responsiveness of tumors that became resistant to the two estrogen antagonists and the effects of these drugs on estrogen-regulated gene expression.
METHODS: MCF-7 cells were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of castrated, female nude mice. The effects of repeated doses of tamoxifen and ICI 182,780 (500 micrograms and 5 mg, respectively) on the growth of established tumors (8-10 mm in size) were determined after supplemental estrogen was removed. The effects of antiestrogen treatments on the process of tumorigenesis, in the absence of estrogen supplementation, were determined by initiating drug administration on the same day as tumor cell inoculation. To evaluate the hormonal responsiveness of tumors resistant to tamoxifen and ICI 182,780, 1-mm3 segments of the tumors were transplanted onto the flanks of new recipient mice, which were then treated with estrogen or the antiestrogens--alone or in combination. Tumor growth was monitored by measuring tumor volumes twice a week. Expression of the estrogen-responsive genes, pLIV1 and pS2, in the tumors of treated animals was analyzed using blots of total cellular RNA and complementary DNA probes.
RESULTS: Treatment with ICI 182,780 suppressed the growth of established tumors twice as long as treatment with tamoxifen or estrogen withdrawal. Tumorigenesis, in the absence of supplemental estrogen, was delayed to a greater extent in ICI 182,780-treated mice than in tamoxifen-treated mice. ICI 182,780 was found to be more effective than tamoxifen in reducing the expression of estrogen-regulated genes. Most tumors eventually became resistant to ICI 182,780 and grew independently of estrogen.
CONCLUSIONS: ICI 182,780 is a more effective estrogen antagonist than tamoxifen in the MCF-7 tumor cell/nude mouse model system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7563152     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/87.10.746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  67 in total

1.  The antioxidant neuroprotective effects of estrogens and phenolic compounds are independent from their estrogenic properties.

Authors:  B Moosmann; C Behl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The molecular mechanisms underlying the pharmacological actions of ER modulators: implications for new drug discovery in breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald P McDonnell; Suzanne E Wardell
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 3.  The future of antihormone therapy: innovations based on an established principle.

Authors:  K Parczyk; M R Schneider
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  The changing role of ER in endocrine resistance.

Authors:  Agostina Nardone; Carmine De Angelis; Meghana V Trivedi; C Kent Osborne; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor as predictive biomarkers of response to endocrine therapy: a prospectively powered pathology study in the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational trial.

Authors:  John M S Bartlett; Cassandra L Brookes; Tammy Robson; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Lucinda J Billingham; Fiona M Campbell; Margaret Grant; Annette Hasenburg; Elysée T M Hille; Charlene Kay; Dirk G Kieback; Hein Putter; Christos Markopoulos; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Elizabeth A Mallon; Luc Dirix; Caroline Seynaeve; Daniel Rea
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Characterization of the pharmacophore properties of novel selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs).

Authors:  Karen J Kieser; Dong Wook Kim; Kathryn E Carlson; Benita S Katzenellenbogen; John A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Flexible small molecular anti-estrogens with N,N-dialkylated-2,5-diethoxy-4-morpholinoaniline scaffold targets multiple estrogen receptor conformations.

Authors:  Bethany K Asare; Emmanuel Yawson; Rajendram V Rajnarayanan
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Effects of short-term antiestrogen treatment of primary breast cancer on estrogen receptor mRNA and protein expression and on estrogen-regulated genes.

Authors:  R A McClelland; D L Manning; J M Gee; E Anderson; R Clarke; A Howell; M Dowsett; J F Robertson; R W Blamey; A E Wakeling; R I Nicholson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Long-range transcriptional control of progesterone receptor gene expression.

Authors:  Jamie Bonéy-Montoya; Yvonne S Ziegler; Carol D Curtis; Jonathan A Montoya; Ann M Nardulli
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-12-01

10.  Avoiding False Positives and Optimizing Identification of True Negatives in Estrogen Receptor Binding and Agonist/Antagonist Assays.

Authors:  Michael W Hornung; Mark A Tapper; Jeffrey S Denny; Barbara R Sheedy; Raymond Erickson; Taylor J Sulerud; Richard C Kolanczyk; Patricia K Schmieder
Journal:  Appl In Vitro Toxicol       Date:  2017-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.