Literature DB >> 7562120

Adherence to screening mammography recommendations in a university general medicine clinic.

N C Dolan1, D R Reifler, M M McDermott, W C McGaghie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors predicting adherence to a health care provider's screening mammography recommendation in a general internal medicine practice.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: An urban academic general internal medicine practice. PATIENTS: Three hundred forty-nine asymptomatic women, aged 50 years and older, without prior history of breast cancer, who received a health care provider's recommendation for screening mammography. MEASUREMENT: Independent variables were: patient age, race, insurance type, educational level, and duration of affiliation with the practice; visit type; and health care provider gender and level of training. Dependent variables were acceptance of the recommendation and adherence, defined as undergoing mammography within three months of the recommendation.
RESULTS: Overall, 193 (55%) of the women underwent the recommended mammography. Two hundred ninety-eight (85%) initially agreed to the recommendation, and of these, 190 (64%) completed mammography within three months. By univariate analysis, acceptance of the recommendation decreased significantly with increasing age (p < 0.01), and by race (African-Americans 89% vs whites 82%, p = 0.05). Only age remained independently predictive of acceptance in a multiple variable analysis. Among women who accepted the recommendation, adherence varied significantly according to race (white 70% vs nonwhite 59%, p = 0.05), insurance type [Medicare as only insurance 45%, Medicaid 66%, non-health maintenance organization (non-HMO) private 62%, HMO 73%, p = 0.03], and health care provider training (attending physicians 73%, residents 58%, nurse practitioners 47%, p = 0.02). In a logistic regression analysis, insurance type and health care provider training remained independently predictive of adherence.
CONCLUSION: Acceptance of screening mammography recommendations decreases with age. Among the women who agreed to the recommendation for screening mammography, insurance type and health care provider level of training best predicted adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7562120     DOI: 10.1007/BF02599947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  23 in total

1.  Determining the efficacy of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Rimer; B Trock; A Balshem; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Breast cancer screening behaviors and attitudes in three racial/ethnic groups.

Authors:  S W Vernon; V G Vogel; S Halabi; G L Jackson; R O Lundy; G N Peters
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women.

Authors:  L S Aiken; S G West; C K Woodward; R R Reno
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Factors influencing women's decision to undergo mammography.

Authors:  J Kruse; D M Phillips
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter?

Authors:  N Lurie; J Slater; P McGovern; J Ekstrum; L Quam; K Margolis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Interval adherence to mammography screening guidelines.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A Stoddard; L Maul; M E Costanza
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Predictors of failure to attend scheduled mammography appointments at a public teaching hospital.

Authors:  K L Margolis; N Lurie; P G McGovern; J S Slater
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

Authors:  I Andersson; K Aspegren; L Janzon; T Landberg; K Lindholm; F Linell; O Ljungberg; J Ranstam; B Sigfússon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

10.  A nurse practitioner intervention to increase breast and cervical cancer screening for poor, elderly black women. The Harlem Study Team.

Authors:  J Mandelblatt; M Traxler; P Lakin; L Thomas; P Chauhan; S Matseoane; P Kanetsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  9 in total

1.  The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening?

Authors:  M S O'Malley; J A Earp; S T Hawley; M J Schell; H F Mathews; J Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Outcomes of the Learn, Share & Live breast cancer education program for older urban women.

Authors:  C S Skinner; C L Arfken; B Waterman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Lump detection is enhanced in silicone breast models simulating postmenopausal breast tissue.

Authors:  M M McDermott; N C Dolan; J Huang; D Reifler; A W Rademaker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  A test of two interventions to improve compliance with scheduled mammography appointments.

Authors:  K L Margolis; T C Menart
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The primary care pathway to mammography: a long and winding road.

Authors:  R C Burack
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Factors influencing adherence to guidelines for screening mammography among women aged 40 years and older.

Authors:  Saleh M M Rahman; Mark B Dignan; Brent J Shelton
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  C I Kiefe; E Funkhouser; M N Fouad; D S May
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Psychological predictors of attendance at annual breast screening examinations.

Authors:  M V Burton; R Warren; D Price; H Earl
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Mammography stage of adoption among Iranian women.

Authors:  Mitra Moodi; Mohsen Rezaeian; Firoozeh Mostafavi; Gholam R Sharifirad
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2012-10-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.