Literature DB >> 7561985

PEAPS-Q: a questionnaire to measure the psychosocial effects of having an abnormal pap smear. Psychosocial Effects of Abnormal Pap Smears Questionnaire.

A Bennetts1, L Irwig, B Oldenburg, J M Simpson, P Mock, A Boyes, K Adams, E Weisberg, J Shelley.   

Abstract

We have developed the Psychosocial Effects of Abnormal Pap Smears Questionnaire (PEAPS-Q) which measures distress experienced by women undergoing follow-up investigation after an abnormal Pap smear result. A thorough literature review and qualitative research resulted in the development of a questionnaire which was tested on 350 women attending a Family Planning New South Wales (FPNSW) clinic. This sample included women at different stages of management after detection of a cervical abnormality: 93 first colposcopy clients and 257 follow-up colposcopy clients. Factor analysis identified four dimensions of distress: experience of medical procedures, beliefs/feelings about cervical abnormality and changes in perception of oneself, worry about infectivity and effect on sexual relationships. Repeatability of the PEAPS-Q was indicated by intra-class correlations of 0.88 overall and at least 0.60 for each scale. Internal consistency was shown by Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 overall and at least 0.72 for each scale. Validity was demonstrated by the correlation of scale scores with the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) score of 0.32 (95% CI 0.22-0.41). The PEAPS-Q is a valid, reliable and multidimensional instrument for quantifying distress experienced by women with abnormal Pap smears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7561985     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00015-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  18 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Colposcopy non-attendance following an abnormal cervical cancer screening result: a prospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Linda A Liang; Sylke R Zeissig; Gunther Schauberger; Sophie Merzweiler; Kathrin Radde; Sabine Fischbeck; Hans Ikenberg; Maria Blettner; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Psychosocial outcomes of three triage methods for the management of borderline abnormal cervical smears: an open randomised trial.

Authors:  Kirsten J McCaffery; Les Irwig; Robin Turner; Siew Foong Chan; Petra Macaskill; Mary Lewicka; Judith Clarke; Edith Weisberg; Alex Barratt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-23

5.  Women's experiences of abnormal cervical cytology: illness representations, care processes, and outcomes.

Authors:  Alison Karasz; M Diane McKee; Krista Roybal
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Depressive symptoms and cervical neoplasia in HIV+ low-income minority women with human papillomavirus infection.

Authors:  Stacy M Dodd; Deidre B Pereira; Ilona Marion; Michele Andrasik; Rachel Rose; Trudi Simon; Mary Ann Fletcher; Joseph Lucci; Kevin Maher; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; JoNell Efantis-Potter; Michael H Antoni
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009-05-08

7.  Adherence to preventive exercises and self-reported swallowing outcomes in post-radiation head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Eileen Huh Shinn; Karen Basen-Engquist; George Baum; Sven Steen; Rachel Freeman Bauman; William Morrison; Adam Seth Garden; Cathleen Sheil; Kelly Kilgore; Katherine A Hutcheson; Denise Barringer; Ying Yuan; Jan S Lewin
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Developing a questionnaire to measure the psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result and its subsequent management: the TOMBOLA (Trial of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal Smears) trial.

Authors:  N M Gray; L Sharp; S C Cotton; M Avis; Z Philips; I Russell; L G Walker; D Whynes; J Little
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The psychological impact of human papillomavirus testing in women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear test results: 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  E Maissi; T M Marteau; M Hankins; S Moss; R Legood; A Gray
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Cervical cancer screening programmes and policies in 18 European countries.

Authors:  A Anttila; G Ronco; G Clifford; F Bray; M Hakama; M Arbyn; E Weiderpass
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.